Load Bearing Structure with Non-Linear Reinforcing Net Layers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional building construction methods are costly, time-consuming, and exclude many from home ownership and affordable office space due to high construction costs and rising rents, necessitating a rapid and cost-effective method for building structures using locally available materials.

Innovation Solution

A load-bearing structure comprising a first and second fixed net layer with a non-linear reinforcing structure in between, allowing for in-situ fabrication using minimally supported tensile and compressive load-bearing materials, enabling rapid construction with locally sourced materials and on-site modification of building design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional building construction methods are used, then structural strength and durability are ensured, but construction time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction speedVSAvoidconstruction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The building structure is divided into modular panels that can be pre-fabricated and assembled rapidly on-site. Each panel is a self-contained unit with standardized dimensions and connection points, enabling parallel fabrication and reducing overall construction time while maintaining structural integrity through standardized joining mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Structural panels and components are pre-fabricated off-site with precise detailing and quality control before delivery to the construction site. This preliminary fabrication allows concurrent preparation of multiple building elements, significantly reducing on-site assembly time and enabling faster overall construction while ensuring consistent structural quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If conventional construction methods are used, then structural integrity is maintained, but material costs and labor expenses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention utilizes alternative materials with different physical and mechanical properties than traditional construction materials. By changing material parameters such as tensile strength, compressive strength, and bonding characteristics, the structure achieves required performance at lower cost while enabling simplified fabrication processes and reduced labor requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The building structure employs composite construction combining different materials with complementary properties. This composite approach optimizes the strength-to-cost ratio by selecting materials that provide necessary structural performance at lower expense than conventional homogeneous materials, while also enabling simplified assembly procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If traditional post and beam structural configuration is used, then structural stability is ensured, but construction complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the traditional post-and-beam framework from the structural system. Instead of relying on a complex network of vertical and horizontal structural members, the design uses alternative load-bearing elements and distribution mechanisms that simplify the overall structural configuration while maintaining necessary stability and strength through different structural principles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The structural approach is inverted by replacing the conventional load-path methodology with an alternative system that distributes forces differently throughout the structure. This inversion allows for simplified geometry and reduced structural complexity while achieving equivalent or superior stability through novel load transfer mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS10533339B2Building structure and method
Publication Date: 2020.01.14 WILSEY MARK E
  • US10533339B2 patent drawing
  • US10533339B2 patent drawing
  • US10533339B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A load bearing structure including a first fixed net layer, a second fixed net layer and a non-linear structure in between. The first fixed net layer may include a first layer of flexible, drapable fabric and a fixing material that fixes the shape of the first layer of flexible, drapable fabric. The second fixed net layer may include a second layer of flexible, drapable fabric and a fixing material that fixes the shape of the second layer of flexible, drapable fabric. The non-linear reinforcing structure may be in communication with the first and second fixed net layers and may be configured to share with the first and second fixed net layers a load applied to the load bearing structure.