Load Carrier Retaining Mechanism for Automated Rack Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for automatic transfer and separation of load carriers from gravity feed racks lack reliability and efficiency, particularly in industrial settings where manual operation introduces errors and reduces productivity.

Innovation Solution

A handling system comprising a gravity feed rack with a retaining mechanism featuring an axially rotatably mounted shaft, front and rear retaining elements, and a deflection element that cooperates with an engagement element via an oblique contact surface to rotate the shaft, allowing controlled acceptance and separation of load carriers, ensuring reliable and automated transfer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a stationary retaining device is used on the discharge side, then load carriers are prevented from falling off, but the system cannot automatically accept load carriers from mobile robot units

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload carrier containmentVSAvoidautomatic load carrier acceptance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The retaining device is transformed from a stationary component to a movable one that can be actuated by the mobile robot unit. The retaining element is mounted on a movable support that can shift between retaining and releasing positions, enabling automatic control while maintaining reliability in preventing load carrier escape.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A sensor system acts as an intermediary between the mobile robot unit and the retaining device. The sensor detects the approach of the robot unit and automatically triggers the retaining element to move, enabling automatic acceptance without direct mechanical coupling or complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If manual operation is used for load carrier transfer, then system complexity is reduced, but efficiency and productivity are impaired

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload carrier transfer efficiencyVSAvoidautomation mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the mobile robot unit itself as the actuating force for the retaining device. The robot unit's movement automatically triggers the retaining element to release the load carrier through direct mechanical interaction, eliminating the need for separate actuators, motors, or complex control systems while achieving full automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

A simple sensor serves as an intermediary that detects the robot unit's approach and automatically initiates the retaining element's movement. This minimal intermediary enables automatic operation without requiring complex control systems, maintaining low device complexity while significantly improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the retaining device is designed for manual operation, then the design remains simple, but the system cannot provide reliable automatic separation of load carriers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic load carrier separationVSAvoidretaining mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mobile robot unit provides the actuating force for both retention and release operations. As the robot unit approaches and makes contact with the retaining element, its own movement automatically triggers the release mechanism, ensuring reliable automatic separation without requiring additional actuators or complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

A sensor acts as an intermediary that detects the robot unit's approach and automatically triggers the retaining element's movement. This simple intermediary enables reliable automatic separation while keeping the retaining mechanism design simple and robust.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Extent of automation

If a movable retaining device is used to enable automatic acceptance, then automation is achieved, but the risk of inadvertently accepting following load carriers increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic load carrier acceptanceVSAvoidselective load carrier acceptance
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The retaining function is segmented into two distinct elements: a front retaining element that prevents load carriers from escaping the gravity feed rack, and a rear retaining element that prevents following load carriers from moving forward. This segmentation enables independent control of each retention function, ensuring that only the intended load carrier is accepted while preventing inadvertent acceptance of subsequent carriers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A sensor system acts as an intermediary that detects the robot unit's approach and coordinates the movement of retaining elements. The sensor ensures that the retaining elements are positioned correctly before and during the acceptance process, providing reliable selective acceptance while preventing following load carriers from moving forward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enables reliable, controlled, and automated transfer of load carriers, reducing errors and increasing efficiency by coordinating the movement of retaining elements, and is designed to be simple, robust, and cost-effective.

Implementation Method 1

the deflection element is configured to cooperate with the engagement element via the contact surface in order to rotate the shaft counter to a restoring force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

the deflection element is configured to cooperate with the engagement element via the contact surface extending obliquely to an axial direction of the shaft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWedge: Wedge

Data Source

PatentUS11840412B2Handling system for the automatic transfer and separation of load carriers
Publication Date: 2023.12.12 FORD WERKE GMBH
  • US11840412B2 patent drawing
  • US11840412B2 patent drawing
  • US11840412B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A handling system includes a gravity feed rack, a pick-up rack, a front retaining element, and a rear retaining element. The gravity feed rack includes a retaining mechanism having an axially rotatably mounted shaft. The front retaining element is connected to the shaft. The front retaining element is moveable to a first retaining position to inhibit movement of a first load carrier. The rear retaining element is connected to the shaft and moveable to a second retaining position to inhibit movement of a second load carrier. When the gravity feed rack and the pick-up rack are brought together, at least one contact surface of a deflection element is configured to cooperate with the engagement element in order to rotate the shaft counter to a restoring force causing the front retaining element to move from the first retaining position and the rear retaining element to move to the second retaining position.