Load Control Device for Power Grid Overload Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing energy transmission systems face significant challenges in managing large numbers of energy producers and consumers, leading to considerable simulation and computing effort, and often cannot avoid overloading local power grids, despite efforts to optimize energy flow and power plant control.

Innovation Solution

An energy transmission system equipped with a load control device that can monitor and control energy consumption across multiple local line networks, allowing for the reallocation of energy consumption to prevent overloading by reducing consumption in overloaded networks and increasing it in non-overloaded ones, thereby stabilizing the higher-level energy transmission network.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If simulation and active load control of all consumers are implemented, then energy flow optimization and power plant control improve, but simulation and computing effort increase considerably

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy flow optimizationVSAvoidsimulation and computing effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments consumers into two categories: large consumers that are explicitly simulated and controlled, and small consumers that are aggregated into equivalent load models. This segmentation allows the system to optimize energy flow for significant loads while avoiding the computational burden of individually modeling every consumer, thus resolving the contradiction between optimization reliability and computing effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by selectively applying detailed simulation and control only to large consumers whose impact on the energy transmission system is significant. Small consumers are handled through aggregated models, providing sufficient control without the excessive computing effort that would result from detailed modeling of all consumers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Productivity

If detailed simulation of all consumers is performed, then optimal energy flow control improves, but computing time and resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimal energy flow controlVSAvoidcomputing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting consumers into large and small categories with different modeling approaches, the system achieves optimal energy flow control for the most impactful loads while significantly reducing computing time through aggregated models for less critical consumers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the modeling parameters for different consumer categories: detailed parameters for large consumers and aggregated equivalent parameters for small consumers. This parameter differentiation maintains control accuracy where needed while reducing computational complexity elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2652854B1Power transmission system
Publication Date: 2018.07.11 SIEMENS AG
  • EP2652854B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2652854B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2652854B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a power transmission system (10) having at least two local grids (40, 41) which are each connected to loads (50-52, 53-55) and are connected to a higher-level power transmission network (30). According to the invention the power transmission system (10) has at least one load control unit (60), each of which is connected directly or indirectly to at least one load (50-54) of the at least two local grids (40, 41) and is suitable for controlling the consumption of said loads (50-54), and moreover the load control unit (60) is suitable for evaluating the load state of the at least two local grids (40, 41) and, in the event of an overload which has occurred or is imminent on one of the at least two local grids (40), for reducing the consumption of at least one load (50, 51) of said local grid (40) and conversely for increasing the consumption of at least one load (53) in one of the other local grids (41), which is not overloaded, of the at least two local grids.