Load Control Replacement Using RFID Location-Based Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing load control systems require tedious manual reconfiguration of new load control devices, such as electronic dimming ballasts, after replacement, necessitating the input of serial numbers for each device, which becomes cumbersome with multiple replacements.

Innovation Solution

The system utilizes a remote identification tag, like an RFID transponder, to automatically program new load control devices by associating them with a stored identifier of the installation location, allowing the controller to transmit the necessary settings to the new device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual reconfiguration is used for new load control devices, then configuration accuracy is maintained, but installation time and operational complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration accuracyVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-storing configuration data and device identifiers in the controller before the replacement event occurs. When a new load control device is installed, the controller automatically retrieves the appropriate configuration data based on the device identifier without requiring manual reconfiguration, thus maintaining configuration accuracy while significantly reducing installation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copying by creating a digital copy of the configuration data associated with the removed load control device and transferring it to the new device. The controller stores configuration data linked to device identifiers, and when replacement occurs, the system copies the relevant configuration information from the removed device's record to the new device, ensuring accurate replication of settings without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If manual reconfiguration is performed for each replacement, then configuration accuracy is maintained, but the complexity of operation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration accuracyVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by enabling automatic configuration transfer without requiring user intervention. The new load control device automatically identifies itself through its identifier, the controller automatically retrieves the corresponding configuration data, and the system automatically applies the settings. This eliminates the need for manual reconfiguration operations, significantly reducing operational complexity while maintaining configuration accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms where the new load control device transmits its identifier to the controller, which then feedbacks the appropriate configuration data back to the new device. This automated feedback loop ensures that the correct configuration information is automatically applied, maintaining accuracy while simplifying the user's role to merely the physical replacement action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If multiple manual reconfigurations are performed, then device functionality is maintained, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice functionalityVSAvoidreplacement efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller performs preliminary action by pre-storing configuration data associated with device identifiers before any replacement occurs. This preparation allows the system to instantly retrieve and apply the correct configuration when a replacement happens, maintaining device functionality reliability while dramatically improving replacement efficiency by eliminating time-consuming manual reconfiguration processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical manual reconfiguration process with an automated electronic system. Instead of requiring physical manual intervention to reconfigure settings, the system uses electronic identification and automated data transfer through the controller, substituting the mechanical operation with an automated information-processing system that maintains functionality while boosting productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables fully automatic reconfiguration of load control devices without user input, simplifying the replacement process and ensuring consistent operation with the previous device settings.

Implementation Method 1

using a remote identification tag, such as a radio-frequency identification (RFID) transponder that is associated with the location (e.g., fixture) in which the new load control device is installed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadio-frequency identification (RFID):

Data Source

PatentUS12547854B2Location-based configuration of a load control device
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 LUTRON TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LLC
  • US12547854B2 patent drawing
  • US12547854B2 patent drawing
  • US12547854B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of automatically programming a new load control device that replaces an old load control device takes advantage of a remote identification tag (e.g., an RFID tag) located in the vicinity of the old device. The remote identification tag stores an identifier that is representative of a location in which the old device is installed. The method includes the steps of: (1) storing a setting of an old device in a memory of a controller; (2) associating the setting with the identifier of the old device in the memory of the controller; (3) the new device retrieving the identifier from the remote identification tag after the new device is installed in the location of the old device; (4) the new device transmitting the identifier to the controller; and (5) the controller transmitting the setting of the old device to the new device in response to receiving the identifier.