Load Frequency Control Using Merit Order and Fast Output Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing load frequency control methods fail to effectively reduce fuel costs while maintaining system frequency stability, especially with the integration of renewable energy sources, as they often reduce the number of power generators distributing area requirements, leading to frequency fluctuations.

Innovation Solution

A load frequency control device that calculates area requirements and determines output distribution ratios based on economic efficiency, using a merit order method to allocate regulated power to power generators, prioritizing distribution according to fuel cost for both increases and decreases in power output.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If area requirement is distributed to fewer power generators based on merit order, then fuel cost is reduced, but frequency fluctuation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel costVSAvoidfrequency stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts the area requirement distribution strategy based on real-time system frequency conditions. When frequency deviation exceeds thresholds, the system switches from pure merit order distribution to a mode that includes faster-response generators, thereby adapting the distribution criterion to current system needs and resolving the contradiction between cost reduction and frequency stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the distribution parameters (distribution criteria, time constants, weighting factors) based on system frequency conditions. By adjusting these parameters dynamically, the system optimizes the balance between economic efficiency and frequency control performance, allowing merit order to prevail under normal conditions while ensuring frequency stability during disturbances

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If area requirement is distributed based on output change speed, then frequency fluctuation is suppressed, but fuel cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency stabilityVSAvoidfuel cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using output change speed as a distribution criterion only when necessary (when frequency deviation exceeds thresholds), rather than continuously. This partial application of the faster-response strategy minimizes fuel cost increase while providing frequency stabilization only when needed, resolving the contradiction with the more economical merit order approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If renewable energy is introduced to power system, then energy diversity is improved, but frequency control capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy diversityVSAvoidfrequency control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces regulated power sources as intermediaries between renewable energy sources and the frequency control system. These regulated sources (thermal or hydro generators) compensate for the frequency control deficiencies of renewable energy, allowing high renewable penetration while maintaining frequency stability through the mediating action of controllable generators

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11811409B2Load frequency control device and load frequency control method
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 HITACHI LTD
  • US11811409B2 patent drawing
  • US11811409B2 patent drawing
  • US11811409B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In order to suppress frequency fluctuation caused by a load frequency, an AR calculating section calculates an AR using system frequency deviation and tie-line power flow deviation as inputs. An output distribution ratio determining section determines a ratio of output distribution according to merit order based on the AR calculated by the AR calculating section. An output distributing section determines output distribution according to an output change speed based on the output distribution ratio determined by the output distribution ratio determining section according to the output change speed. An output distributing section determines output distribution according to the merit order based on the output distribution ratio determined by the output distribution ratio determining section according to the merit order. An output distribution instruction value determining section determines an output distribution instruction value to each regulated power source using, as inputs, output distribution values determined by the output distributing sections.