Load-relieving Device Axial Thrust Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing turbomachine axial thrust compensation methods, such as balancing discs, single piston, and double piston, face issues during start-up and shut-down where pressure differences have not yet built up, leading to potential contact between relief and counter-elements, resulting in rubbing and increased overall length due to separate housings and lubricants.

Innovation Solution

A device is integrated onto the counter-element within the turbomachine, featuring a force-generating element, such as a spring, and an axially displaceable element with a sliding bearing, preventing the relief element from rubbing against the counter-element by maintaining a controlled distance through hydraulic or magnetic forces, eliminating the need for additional housings and lubricants.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If spring packs in a separate lifting device are used to prevent rubbing during start-up, then rubbing is prevented, but the overall length is extended and a separate housing is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of rubbingVSAvoidoverall length
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The lifting device is merged with the counter-element by integrating the spring pack directly onto the counter-element surface. The device comprises a spring pack and an axially displaceable element that is integrally formed with or directly mounted on the counter-element, eliminating the need for a separate lifting device housing and reducing overall length while maintaining rubbing prevention functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The counter-element is given multiple functions: it serves both as the thrust-bearing surface and as the mounting base for the lifting device. The axially displaceable element integrates the lifting function with the counter-element structure, allowing one component to perform multiple roles and eliminate separate housings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Force

If a cardanic ring in a separate sealed room is used to absorb axial forces, then axial forces are absorbed, but additional overall length is created

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxial force absorptionVSAvoidoverall length
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The lifting device is merged with the counter-element structure. The spring pack and axially displaceable element are integrated onto the counter-element, combining the axial force absorption function with the existing counter-element geometry, thereby avoiding extension of the stationary housing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Force

If freely movable axial bearing and outer bearing ring with spring force are used to limit axial thrust, then axial thrust is limited, but overall length is extended and additional lubrication is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxial thrust limitationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lifting device components (spring pack and axially displaceable element) are merged with the counter-element, reducing the number of separate bearing components. This integration simplifies the device structure while maintaining axial thrust limitation through the spring force mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The spring pack automatically generates the necessary lifting force during start-up and shut-down without requiring external lubrication systems. The device uses the inherent spring force and the pumped medium itself to prevent rubbing, eliminating the need for separate lubrication infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Length of moving object

If the device is arranged on the counter-element within the flow area, then no extension of shaft or housing is required, but the device must function in the medium flow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshaft lengthVSAvoidadaptability to medium flow
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The axially displaceable element acts as an intermediary between the spring pack and the relief element. It is designed to be compatible with the medium flow, allowing the spring force to be transmitted while the element itself can withstand or be compatible with the pumped medium environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures reliable prevention of relief element contact with the counter-element during start-up and shut-down, maintaining the radial throttle gap geometry, reducing wear, and avoiding additional length and lubrication requirements, while achieving balanced forces and efficient operation.

Implementation Method 1

The device comprises a spring pack (14)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The pressure difference acting between two sides of the balancing element results in a balancing force that opposes the axial thrust

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure difference: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 3

The relief force, which is just as great as the axial thrust

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic force: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 4

A sliding bearing element (16) is preferably arranged on the axially displaceable element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLubrication: Lubrication

Data Source

PatentEP3071840B1Load-relieving device
Publication Date: 2020.01.01 KSB SE & CO KGAA
  • EP3071840B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3071840B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The invention relates to an arrangement for compensating the axial thrust of a fluid-flow machine. A load-relieving element (11) is non-rotatably connected to a shaft (1). A flow-restrictor gap (13) is formed by this element together with a counter-element (12) secured to the housing, said gap being formed between the load-relieving element (11) and the counter-element (12). The counter-element (12) is provided with a device for maintaining the distance between the load-relieving element (11) and the counter-element (12). The device comprises at least one force-generating element (14). Said force -generating element (14) generates a force that acts in opposition to the axial thrust.