Load-Sensing Hydraulic Safety Control for Stationary Demolition Arms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Construction equipment, particularly demolition robots, pose hazards due to unexpected movements of their movable members, which can injure nearby persons and fail to meet safety standards like ISO 13849.

Innovation Solution

A hydraulic system with a load sensing (LS) circuit and a control unit that configures the system in a safe mode, using pressure feedback to ensure movable members remain stationary, thereby protecting nearby individuals from unexpected movements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a hydraulic system operates without additional safety sensors, then the device complexity and cost are reduced, but the safety and reliability are insufficient to meet ISO 13849 standards

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes the existing load sensing circuit pressure feedback to monitor the state of movable members. The control unit continuously receives pressure feedback signals from the LS circuit and compares them against threshold values to detect unexpected movements, thereby implementing a safety function without adding separate sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the existing load sensing circuit serve a dual purpose: its original function of controlling hydraulic valve operation and an additional safety monitoring function. By using the same pressure feedback infrastructure for both control and safety purposes, the system avoids the need for separate safety sensors and reduces overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If a hydraulic system is equipped with separate safety sensors to detect unexpected movements, then the safety and reliability improve, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a multi-functional use of the load sensing circuit by enabling it to perform both its traditional hydraulic control function and an additional safety monitoring function. The same pressure feedback signal is used for both valve control and unexpected movement detection, eliminating the need for separate safety sensors and reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit continuously monitors the pressure feedback signal from the load sensing circuit and compares it against predetermined threshold values. This feedback mechanism enables the system to detect unexpected movements of movable members and trigger appropriate safety responses without requiring additional sensing hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the hydraulic system triggers a safety-related action immediately upon detecting unexpected movement, then the safety response time is reduced, but the productivity and operational continuity are affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety responseVSAvoidoperational continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent differentiates between hazardous and non-hazardous functions by implementing separate monitoring thresholds and response strategies for each. The control unit can trigger safety actions for hazardous functions while allowing non-hazardous functions to continue operating, thereby maintaining operational continuity where safe to do so.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses different pressure threshold values to distinguish between normal operational variations and unexpected movements requiring safety intervention. By adjusting and monitoring pressure parameters against predefined thresholds, the system achieves rapid safety response only when genuinely needed, avoiding unnecessary shutdowns of productive operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12313099B2Hydraulic system with a functional safety feature for demolition robots
Publication Date: 2025.05.27 HUSQVARNA AB
  • US12313099B2 patent drawing
  • US12313099B2 patent drawing
  • US12313099B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hydraulic system for controlling one or more movable members on construction equipment such as a demolition robot, where the hydraulic system is configurable in a safe mode of operation in which at least one of the movable members is intended to be stationary. The system comprises a load sensing (LS) circuit and a first hydraulic pressure sensor arranged to sense a first LS pressure in a first LS circuit part of the LS circuit. The system also comprises a control unit arranged to monitor the sensed first LS pressure, compare the first LS pressure to a predetermined acceptance criterion associated with stationarity of the one or more movable members, and trigger a safety-related action by the hydraulic system in case the first LS pressure does not satisfy the acceptance criterion even though the safe mode of operation is configured.