Patient Support Release Interlock for Inverted and Loaded Detachment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing patient positioning support systems lack a fail-safe mechanism to prevent improper disconnection of patient support structures from the base structure, which can lead to accidental falls or injuries during medical procedures.

Innovation Solution

A fail-safe release mechanism is introduced, featuring a two-part interlock system that includes a direct mechanical link and a software-synchronized mechanism, preventing the release of one part before the other, and is dependent on the orientation and load of the patient support structure, ensuring secure attachment even when the patient is upside down, and includes a hand-held pendant for operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a removable connection system is used to allow easy assembly and disassembly of patient support structures, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to risk of improper disconnection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of assembly and disassemblyVSAvoidsecurity of connection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system requires preliminary verification of connection status through indicators (visual, audible, or tactile) before allowing release. The interlock mechanism performs preliminary checks to ensure proper engagement before permitting disassembly, preventing improper disconnection while maintaining ease of operation when correctly performed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The connection system incorporates feedback mechanisms including visual indicators, audible signals, or tactile cues that provide real-time information about connection status. This feedback ensures operators can verify proper engagement before and during assembly/disassembly operations, enhancing both reliability and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If a simple release mechanism is used for quick detachment, then productivity is improved, but reliability worsens due to lack of fail-safe protection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of detachmentVSAvoidprevent improper disconnection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The release mechanism incorporates preliminary verification steps that must be completed before detachment is permitted. Indicators show connection status and the system requires specific actions to be taken in sequence, ensuring safety while maintaining efficient operation when properly executed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The release mechanism is segmented into distinct sequential steps with clear indicators for each stage. This segmentation allows for quick, standardized operations when performed correctly while built-in verification at each stage prevents improper disconnection, balancing productivity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If an interlock system requiring sequential release is implemented, then reliability is improved by preventing improper disconnection, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevent improper disconnectionVSAvoidcomplexity of release mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical interlock systems with electronic or software-based control mechanisms. Sensors, microprocessors, and control algorithms manage the sequential release requirements, reducing mechanical complexity while maintaining or enhancing reliability through programmable safety logic and automated verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is designed to be universal, handling multiple functions including monitoring connection status, providing user feedback, controlling sequential release, and preventing improper disconnection through a single integrated platform. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity compared to dedicated mechanical mechanisms for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If software-controlled release mechanisms are used to synchronize interlock release, then reliability is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to reduced manual control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronized releaseVSAvoidmanual control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The software-controlled system performs self-verification of connection status and automatically manages the release sequence. The system monitors itself, detects improper conditions, and controls the timing and sequence of releases without requiring complex manual coordination, actually simplifying operator interaction while enhancing reliability through automated synchronized release.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11119525B2Fail-safe release mechanism for use with patient positioning support apparati
Publication Date: 2021.09.14 WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC INC
  • US11119525B2 patent drawing
  • US11119525B2 patent drawing
  • US11119525B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fail-safe release mechanism for use with patient positioning support apparati having a base structure and a patient support structure, to prevent collapse of the patient support during disconnection of the patient support structure from the base structure.