Loading Device for Radial Flow Reactor Catalyst Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for filling ammonia synthesis reactors with radial flow are inefficient due to restricted access and design limitations, leading to suboptimal catalyst bed bulk densities and prolonged downtime during catalyst changes.

Innovation Solution

A loading device with offset loading heads and a rotating, vertically movable loading ring equipped with deflection cones and funnel elements allows for tangential and axial movement of catalyst particles, ensuring even distribution and dense packing within the reactor's radial design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If hose loading method is used to fill catalyst beds, then the loading process is simple and continuous, but the achieved bulk density is below the required value

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading process simplicityVSAvoidcatalyst bed bulk density
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The loading device is divided into multiple loading heads (at least three) that are distributed around the reactor periphery, each independently delivering catalyst material. This segmentation allows simultaneous multi-point loading, increasing the effective loading area and enabling dense packing while maintaining continuous operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from single-point vertical loading to multi-point radial loading by distributing loading heads around the reactor circumference. This dimensional change from one-dimensional vertical feeding to two-dimensional radial distribution enables particles to arrange themselves into denser packing structures throughout the bed cross-section

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If dense loading with rotating distribution system is used, then high bulk density is achieved, but the system cannot be applied to radial flow reactors due to access restrictions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst bed bulk densityVSAvoidapplicability to radial flow reactors
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of bringing the distribution system into the reactor from the top (conventional approach), the invention positions loading heads on the reactor periphery and delivers catalyst radially inward. This inverted loading direction enables adaptation to radial flow reactors where top access is restricted by lattice constructions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The loading device acts as an intermediary system that bridges the gap between external catalyst supply and the restricted reactor interior. By positioning loading heads outside the reactor and using deflection cones to redirect material radially inward, the system overcomes access limitations imposed by radial flow reactor design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If catalyst is loaded quickly onto a small area, then loading speed is high, but particle interference prevents dense packing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading speedVSAvoidcatalyst bed bulk density
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The catalyst loading is segmented into multiple streams from different loading heads positioned around the reactor periphery. This distributes the particle flux over a larger effective area, reducing particle interference and collision while maintaining high overall loading rates through parallel operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies excessive loading capacity by providing multiple loading heads that can operate simultaneously, delivering more catalyst material than a single head could provide. This excessive action, distributed across multiple points, ensures dense packing is achieved while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables rapid and efficient catalyst loading, achieving higher bulk densities and reducing downtime by facilitating even particle distribution and preventing short-circuit flows in radial flow reactors.

Implementation Method 1

the particles interfering with each other when arranged in a dense packing structure, whereas with dense loading, many particles fall onto a larger area in a short time

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP2892641B1Loading device
Publication Date: 2016.11.02 THYSSENKRUPP IND SOLUTIONS AG
  • EP2892641B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2892641B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The invention relates to a loading device having N loading heads offset by N/360°, wherein N is the number 3 or an integer multiple thereof, wherein each of the N loading heads has a connecting device for a hose arranged at the upper end, through which hose the catalyst material can be delivered from above, wherein each of the N loading heads has a deflecting cone with the tip pointing upwards beneath the connecting device and joined to the connecting device, a vertical holder is mounted on the underside of said deflecting cone, at least two circular deflector funnel elements are mounted on the vertical holder by means of horizontal braces, the deflector funnel elements open more narrowly at the top than at the bottom, gaps are provided between the deflector funnel elements and the lower deflector funnel elements have a larger diameter than the deflector funnel elements above them.