Automated Loading Dock Vehicle Restraint Arm

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mechanical vehicle restraints at loading docks are complex, costly, and prone to errors due to insufficient robustness, making it difficult to reliably prevent vehicles from rolling away during loading and unloading, which can lead to safety and equipment issues.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle restraint system comprising a base, rotatably mounted arm, arm rotator, contact sensor, position sensor, lock, and controller that automatically adjusts the arm's position to restrain vehicles, ensuring accurate engagement and disengagement, and provides user feedback on the restraint status.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If wheel chocks are used to restrain vehicles, then the system is simple and cost-effective, but reliability is poor due to operator error and difficulty in ensuring correct placement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverestraint system structureVSAvoidvehicle restraint reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects vehicle presence through sensors and actuates the arm to engage with the vehicle without operator intervention. The controller monitors sensor inputs and autonomously controls the arm rotator and lock actuator, eliminating the need for manual chock placement and ensuring consistent reliable operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical wheel chocks are replaced with an automated electromechanical system featuring sensors, controllers, and motorized actuators. This substitution transforms the simple but unreliable manual system into a complex yet reliable automated system that eliminates human error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If automated mechanical restraints are implemented, then reliability improves through automatic operation, but device complexity and cost increase due to additional components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle restraint reliabilityVSAvoidrestraint system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The single arm structure performs multiple functions: it detects vehicle presence, positions itself to engage the vehicle, provides the restraining force, and locks into position. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components for each function, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates sensors that continuously monitor vehicle presence and arm position, providing feedback to the controller. This feedback loop enables automatic adjustment and verification of restraint engagement, ensuring reliable operation while using a streamlined component structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Strength

If existing mechanical restraints are used, then vehicle restraint is provided, but robustness is insufficient to withstand loading dock environment and components fail

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent robustnessVSAvoidrestraint system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The arm is constructed from heavy-duty steel or other high-strength materials capable of withstanding the demanding loading dock environment. This use of robust materials ensures the component can handle repeated use and environmental stresses without failure, while the integrated design keeps the overall structure relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Ease of operation

If the arm rotates freely without locking, then ease of operation improves for vehicle engagement and disengagement, but reliability decreases as the arm cannot maintain restraining position

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearm positioningVSAvoidrestraint position stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The arm transitions between dynamic and static states based on operational requirements. During vehicle engagement and disengagement, the arm rotates freely under motor control. Once positioned, the lock actuator engages to maintain a stable static position, providing both ease of operation and reliable position maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The lock actuator is positioned and configured in advance to engage with the arm at the correct restraining position. This preliminary arrangement ensures that when the arm reaches the desired position, the lock can immediately engage to maintain reliability without requiring additional adjustment or intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively prevents vehicles from rolling away by ensuring accurate and reliable engagement of the arm with the vehicle, reducing the risk of accidents and equipment damage while being more robust and cost-effective than existing solutions.

Implementation Method 1

a contact sensor for detecting contact between said arm and said vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectContact detection:

Implementation Method 2

a position sensor to detect the rotational position of said arm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPosition sensing:

Implementation Method 3

an arm rotator for rotating said arm between said lowered and upright positions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRotational motion:

Implementation Method 4

a lock actuator in operative communication with and responsive to the contact sensor and position sensor for actuating said lock to retain said arm when in said upright position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical locking: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentUS8529183B2Vehicle restraint system
Publication Date: 2013.09.10 BLUE GIANT EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
  • US8529183B2 patent drawing
  • US8529183B2 patent drawing
  • US8529183B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a system for restraining a vehicle at a loading dock, having a base, an arm rotatably mounted to the base for rotating between a lowered position out of contact with the vehicle, a partially elevated position and an upright position for contacting the vehicle to restrain the vehicle in a position suitable for loading or unloading, an arm rotator, a position sensor to detect the rotational position of the arm, a lock and a lock actuator for locking the arm, and a controller in operative communication with the position sensor for determining the position of the vehicle relative to the dock upon contact between the arm and the vehicle for actuating the lock to retain the arm in the upright position to restrain the vehicle.