Loading Frame Clamping Mechanism for Stable Container Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing storage and retrieval systems for online retail businesses face inefficiencies in storing tens of thousands of product lines, as single-product stacks require large floor areas and are impractical for perishables or infrequently ordered goods, necessitating a more compact and efficient storage solution.

Innovation Solution

A clamping apparatus is introduced to secure a loading frame within a storage system, utilizing a first and second arm with an engagement apparatus and proximity sensors to detect the frame, allowing for secure loading and unloading of containers by an automatic frame loading system, while restraints limit forward and vertical movement to prevent frame displacement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If single-product stacks are used to store products, then product storage is simple and accessible, but large floor area is required and storage efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage system simplicityVSAvoidfloor area
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from horizontal single-product stacks to vertical multi-product stacks arranged in a grid framework. Containers are stacked vertically on upright members, utilizing the third dimension (height) to reduce floor area occupancy while maintaining storage capacity and accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The framework structure with upright members and horizontal grid structures serves multiple functions: supporting vertical stacks, guiding container movement, and enabling access by load handling devices. This multi-functional design replaces multiple separate storage structures with a single integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If multi-product stacks are arranged within a framework structure, then storage density is improved and floor area is reduced, but frame stability and container security are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage densityVSAvoidframe stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The framework is divided into multiple upright members arranged in a grid pattern, with each member supporting independent vertical stacks. This segmentation allows the structure to maintain stability through distributed support while accommodating multiple product types in separate containers within the same framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs horizontal members that curve or bend to engage with containers, providing both support and retention. The curved geometry of horizontal members allows them to secure containers while accommodating slight movements, maintaining both stability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Ease of operation

If load handling devices operate on tracks at the top of the frame, then container access is enabled, but frame complexity and structural requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer accessibilityVSAvoidframe structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The load handling devices are integrated with the framework structure by mounting tracks directly on the horizontal members. This merging of functions allows containers to be accessed without requiring separate external handling equipment, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining operational ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Horizontal members serve as intermediaries between the framework upright members and the load handling devices. They provide the mounting surface for tracks while supporting vertical container stacks, mediating between structural support and operational access functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If multiple load handling devices cooperate to access bins in lowest stack positions, then complete stack accessibility is achieved, but system complexity and coordination requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefull stack accessibilityVSAvoidcoordination system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The load handling devices are designed to autonomously navigate the track system and independently access containers at any stack position. Each device can service multiple stacks without requiring complex centralized coordination, reducing control system complexity while maintaining full accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20240327116A1Mechanical handling apparatus
Publication Date: 2024.10.03 OCADO INNOVATION LTD
  • US20240327116A1 patent drawing
  • US20240327116A1 patent drawing
  • US20240327116A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A clamping apparatus, or dock, which is configured to receive a loading frame when the loading frame is being loaded with containers by an automatic frame loading system. The clamping apparatus includes a first arm and a second arm, with an engagement apparatus received between the two arm. The engagement apparatus may be activated to engage with an inserted loading frame.