Lobed Trailing Edge Burner Injection System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current gas turbine burners face challenges in achieving high efficiency while minimizing NOx emissions and life cycle costs, particularly when operating at high turbine inlet temperatures or burning high reactivity fuels, due to issues with fuel distribution and mixing quality in secondary combustion chambers.

Innovation Solution

The design of a burner with a lobed trailing edge and inline fuel injection system that eliminates the need for high-pressure carrier air, allowing for efficient fuel-air mixing and vortex generation, reducing pressure drop and enabling operation at higher inlet temperatures with fuels like MBtu.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If high-pressure carrier air is used to inject fuel into vortices, then fuel penetration and mixing quality improve, but pressure losses increase and device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel distributionVSAvoidpressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the vortex generation function and fuel injection function into a single integrated device. The streamlined body with lobed trailing edge generates vortices while simultaneously injecting fuel through nozzles located at the trailing edge, eliminating the need for separate vortex generators and high-pressure carrier air systems. This merging reduces pressure losses while maintaining effective fuel penetration and mixing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and eliminates the high-pressure carrier air system from the conventional design. By using low-pressure carrier air and integrating the injection function into the streamlined body, the system removes the need for complex high-pressure air supply infrastructure while achieving comparable or superior fuel distribution through the lobed geometry and inline injection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Manufacturing precision

If high-pressure carrier air system is used, then fuel injection effectiveness improves, but device complexity and cooling requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel distributionVSAvoidinjection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the vortex generation and fuel injection functions into a single streamlined body with lobed trailing edge. The lobes generate vortices that enhance fuel-air mixing while the inline nozzles at the trailing edge inject fuel directly into the flow. This integration eliminates separate vortex generators, high-pressure carrier air systems, and complex control mechanisms, significantly simplifying the overall injection system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Manufacturing precision

If residence time in mixing zone is increased to improve mixing quality, then fuel-air mixing improves, but risk of auto-ignition and flashback increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing qualityVSAvoidflashback prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a streamlined body with lobed trailing edge that generates controlled vortices through its curved geometry. The lobes create rotational flow structures that enhance fuel-air mixing through intense shear and turbulent diffusion. The specific lobe angles and geometry are designed to achieve rapid mixing within a short residence time, preventing auto-ignition while ensuring complete mixing before combustion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the flow parameters by generating strong vortices through the lobed geometry, which increases mixing intensity and reduces the required residence time. The inline fuel injection at the trailing edge also changes the injection parameters, allowing fuel to be injected directly into the vortex cores where mixing is most effective. This parameter optimization achieves high mixing quality with minimal residence time, preventing flashback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple separate devices are used for vortex generation and fuel injection, then functional flexibility improves, but pressure losses and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow conditioning capabilityVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates flow conditioning, vortex generation, and fuel injection into a single streamlined body with lobed trailing edge. The lobes perform flow conditioning and vortex generation while the integrated nozzles perform fuel injection, all within one device. This merging eliminates the pressure losses associated with multiple separate devices and their interconnections, while maintaining the functional flexibility needed for effective combustion control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design increases gas turbine efficiency, reduces pressure losses, and allows for the use of low-pressure carrier air, enabling safe operation with highly reactive fuels while maintaining low NOx emissions and avoiding flashback.

Implementation Method 1

Lobes can be shaped to produce appropriate flow structures. Intense shear of the vortices helps in rapid mixing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex generation: Vortex Generator

Implementation Method 2

The lobe angles should be chosen in such a way that flow separation is avoided

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 3

Intense shear of the vortices helps in rapid mixing and avoidance of low velocity pockets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear-induced mixing: Shear Stress

Implementation Method 4

The momentum flux of the fuel is adjusted relative to the momentum flux of the main flow so as to penetrate in to the vortices

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMomentum flux: Conservation of Momentum

Data Source

PatentEP2496884B1Reheat burner injection system
Publication Date: 2016.12.28 ANSALDO ENERGIA SWITZERLAND AG
  • EP2496884B1 patent drawing
  • EP2496884B1 patent drawing
  • EP2496884B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to a burner (1) for a combustion chamber of a gas turbine, with an injection device (7) for the introduction of at least one gaseous and/or liquid fuel into the burner (1), wherein the injection device (7) has at least one body (22) which is arranged in the burner (1) with at least one nozzle (15) for introducing the at least one fuel into the burner (1), the at least one body being configured as a streamlined body (22) which has a streamlined cross-sectional profile (48) and which extends with a longitudinal direction (49) perpendicularly or at an inclination to a main flow direction (14) prevailing in the burner (1), the at least one nozzle (15) having its outlet orifice at or in a trailing edge (24) of the streamlined body (22), and wherein, with reference to a central plane (35) of the streamlined body (22) the trailing edge (24) is provided with at least two lobes (28, 29) in opposite transverse directions (30, 31).