Local Iteration Control for Data Decoder Convergence

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Data processing circuits often require multiple iterations through data decoder circuits to recover original data, but these iterations do not always yield the best results, leading to inefficiencies in data recovery.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a data processing system with a local iteration determination and limiting circuit that adjusts the number of local iterations based on the quality of decoded outputs, selecting the number of iterations that yields the smallest number of unsatisfied checks, to optimize data decoding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a fixed number of local iterations is applied in the data decoder circuit, then the decoding process is simple to implement, but the decoding accuracy and convergence are not optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding accuracyVSAvoiditeration control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic iteration control by allowing the number of local iterations to vary based on decoding quality metrics. The iteration counter and quality assessment mechanism enable the system to adaptively adjust iteration count rather than using a fixed predetermined number, thereby optimizing decoding accuracy while managing complexity through structured control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the iteration parameter dynamically based on decoding quality assessment. By monitoring metrics such as error correction effectiveness and convergence patterns, the system adjusts the number of local iterations as a controllable parameter, transforming a static configuration into an adaptive process that improves decoding precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple passes are made through the data detector circuit and data decoder circuit, then data recovery chances are increased, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata recovery reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the quality of decoded outputs from each local iteration is assessed and fed back to determine whether additional iterations are warranted. This feedback loop allows the system to terminate processing early when quality thresholds are met, avoiding unnecessary time consumption while maintaining high data recovery reliability through continuous quality monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial iterations when sufficient decoding quality is achieved early in the process, rather than always completing the full predetermined number of iterations. This approach applies just enough processing effort to achieve reliable data recovery, avoiding excessive computation and time expenditure while maintaining high recovery rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If the number of local iterations is increased, then decoding quality may improve, but processing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoded output qualityVSAvoiddata processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the iteration count dynamic rather than fixed, allowing the system to increase iterations only when quality metrics indicate improvement is still possible. This dynamic adjustment optimizes the balance between decoded output quality and processing efficiency by applying additional computational effort only when beneficial.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system treats the number of local iterations as a variable parameter that changes based on real-time quality assessment. By monitoring decoding progress and adjusting the iteration parameter accordingly, the system achieves high decoded output quality without unnecessarily reducing processing efficiency through excessive iterations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8416666B1Systems and methods for local iteration determination during delay processing
Publication Date: 2013.04.09 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD
  • US8416666B1 patent drawing
  • US8416666B1 patent drawing
  • US8416666B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is related to systems and methods for characterizing circuit operation, and more particularly to systems and methods for modifying a data decoding process.