Local Power Block Isolation for Leakage in Multi-Activity Circuits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for reducing power leakage in circuit design, such as using global headers or footers, are costly, complex, and degrade performance by increasing resistance and requiring additional control signals, making them undesirable for maintaining efficiency and performance, especially in battery-powered devices.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a local power block in circuits to decouple inactive portions, using pre-existing control signals to minimize area and cost, and optimizing voltage supply to reduce leakage without affecting high-performance portions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If a global header or footer is added to block leakage current, then leakage current is reduced, but circuit area and routing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleakage currentVSAvoidrouting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the circuit into multiple activity groups (first activity group, second activity group, etc.) and applies separate power blocking mechanisms to each group. Instead of a single global header/footer controlling the entire circuit, individual power blocking is implemented for each activity group, allowing independent control and reducing the complexity of any single control structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local power blocking by placing power blocking devices (such as transmission gates or switches) directly at the power supply nodes of specific activity groups that require leakage reduction. This localized approach allows precise control over which portions of the circuit have their leakage blocked, avoiding the need for complex global routing structures while maintaining effective leakage control where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of energy

If a global header or footer is added to block leakage current, then leakage current is reduced, but circuit area increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleakage currentVSAvoidcircuit area
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the circuit into activity groups and applying power blocking locally to each group rather than globally, the patent reduces the total area required for power blocking structures. Each local power blocking device only needs to handle the current for its specific activity group, allowing for more compact implementation compared to a single global structure that would need to handle the entire circuit current.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the power blocking function with existing circuit structures by utilizing available transistors and power supply nodes within each activity group. Rather than adding completely separate global header/footer structures, the power blocking is integrated into the local circuit architecture, reducing additional area requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Loss of energy

If conventional power blocking is used to reduce leakage, then leakage is reduced, but performance of high activity circuitry deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleakage currentVSAvoidcircuit performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic control of power blocking by using activity detection mechanisms that monitor the operational state of each activity group. When an activity group is detected to be active, the power blocking is automatically removed or reduced, allowing full performance. When inactive, the power blocking is engaged to reduce leakage. This dynamic adjustment ensures that performance is maintained during active operation while achieving leakage reduction during idle periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By dividing the circuit into separate activity groups with independent power control, the patent allows different leakage control strategies to be applied to different portions of the circuit simultaneously. High-activity groups can maintain full power connection for optimal performance, while low-activity or idle groups can have aggressive power blocking applied, achieving overall leakage reduction without compromising the performance of critical high-performance circuitry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Quantity of substance

If feature size is reduced to increase circuit density, then circuit density increases, but leakage current increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit densityVSAvoidleakage current
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the same power blocking mechanism to multiple activity groups throughout the circuit, effectively copying the leakage control solution across different portions of the design. This standardized approach allows consistent leakage management across the entire high-density circuit without requiring different solutions for each component, making the technique scalable to high-density designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The dynamic activity detection and control mechanism allows the circuit to adapt its power consumption characteristics based on actual usage patterns. In high-density circuits where many transistors are packed closely together, the dynamic control ensures that only actively used portions consume significant power, while idle portions are aggressively power-blocked, counteracting the increased leakage that naturally occurs with smaller feature sizes and higher density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8314643B2Circuits and methods employing a local power block for leakage reduction
Publication Date: 2012.11.20 QUALCOMM INC
  • US8314643B2 patent drawing
  • US8314643B2 patent drawing
  • US8314643B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A circuit having a local power block for leakage reduction is disclosed. The circuit has a first portion and a second portion. The first portion is configured to operate at a substantially greater operating frequency than the operating frequency of the second portion. The second portion has a local power block configured to decouple the second portion if the second portion is inactive to reduce leakage current associated with the second portion without sacrificing performance of the first portion.