Local R-Factor Calculation for Boiling Water Reactor Fuel Rods

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining the R-factor in nuclear light water reactors, particularly in boiling water reactors, do not accurately account for the individual properties of fuel rods, leading to inadequate determination of dryout properties and critical power ratios, especially when part-length rods are involved.

Innovation Solution

A method that determines a local R-factor for each fuel rod at multiple axial levels, considering individual axial heat generation profiles, eliminating the need for predetermined weight functions and high additive constants, and calculating a total R-factor for the bundle by maximizing local R-factors at each level, thereby improving accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If predetermined weight functions and high additive constants are used to determine R-factor, then the calculation process is simplified, but the accuracy of dryout property determination deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation simplicityVSAvoiddryout property determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the fuel bundle into multiple axial levels and calculates separate R-factors for each level rather than using a single predetermined weight function. This segmentation allows the calculation to account for local variations in heat generation and coolant flow at different axial positions, improving accuracy while maintaining computational feasibility through systematic breakdown of the problem into discrete segments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by determining specific R-factor values for different axial levels within the fuel bundle. Each level receives a customized R-factor calculation based on its local heat generation rate and neighboring rod conditions, replacing the uniform predetermined weight function approach. This localized treatment captures axial variations in thermal-hydraulic conditions that affect dryout characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If individual axial heat generation profiles are considered for each fuel rod, then the determination accuracy of R-factor is improved, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveR-factor determination accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent manages computational complexity by segmenting the fuel bundle into a finite number of axial levels and calculating R-factors at each discrete level. This approach transforms the continuous problem into a discrete set of calculations, making the computation tractable while still capturing the essential axial variations in heat generation and thermal-hydraulic conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by selecting a representative number of axial levels (not every possible point) to calculate R-factors. This selective sampling provides sufficient accuracy for dryout determination without requiring exhaustive computation at every axial position, balancing precision with computational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If part-length rods are included in the fuel bundle, then the operational flexibility is improved, but the accuracy of dryout margin determination deteriorates due to inadequate compensation methods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel bundle configuration flexibilityVSAvoiddryout margin determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent addresses part-length rods through local quality by calculating specific R-factor values at each axial level where the part-length rods are present. Rather than applying blanket compensation constants, the method computes localized R-factors that reflect the actual thermal conditions at each level, naturally accounting for the reduced heat generation from shorter rods without requiring arbitrary compensation factors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by allowing the R-factor to vary axially through different calculated values at different levels. This dynamic parameter approach replaces static compensation constants with computed values that adapt to the specific configuration of part-length rods, capturing their actual thermal impact on neighboring rods and improving dryout margin determination accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2048670B1Methods and devices relating to a nuclear light water reactor of the boiling water kind
Publication Date: 2015.05.20 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC SWEDEN AB
  • EP2048670B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2048670B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2048670B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention concerns a method of determining the R-factor for a bundle of nuclear fuel rods in a nuclear light water reactor of the boiling water reactor kind. The R-factor is a factor that accounts for the weighted local power influence on a fuel rod. A local R-factor (Ri(z)) is determined for each fuel rod (i) in said bundle and for each of a plurality of levels (z) in an axial direction. The individual axial heat generation profile for a certain fuel rod (i) is taken into account when determining the local R-factors (Ri(z)) for said fuel rod (i). The invention also concerns a processor configured for automatically determining the R-factor, a computer program product, a method of determining the critical power for a bundle of fuel rods, a nuclear energy plant, and a method of operating a nuclear energy plant.