Local Security Routing Tables for Faster Data Authentication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cellular networks lack flexibility in handling data transfer based on sensitivity, leading to inefficient security protocols, prolonged authentication times, and increased network bandwidth usage due to sequential verification of authentication factors.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a local configuration table on individual devices to determine security scores and route transactions through compliant communication channels, eliminating the need for redundant communications with a central server and reducing computational inefficiencies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a central server is used to determine security protocols and route information, then security management is centralized and controlled, but additional communications are required between computing devices and the central server, increasing network bandwidth usage and authentication time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity managementVSAvoidauthentication time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-configures security parameters, authentication factors, and routing rules directly on computing devices before needed. This allows devices to autonomously determine security protocols and route information without real-time central server communication, eliminating sequential verification delays while maintaining centralized security policy enforcement through periodic updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides security management functionality between the central server (policy definition, parameter generation) and computing devices (local evaluation, autonomous decision-making). This segmentation allows the server to set security standards while devices independently apply them, parallelizing the authentication process and reducing network bandwidth usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If multifactor authentication is implemented with sequential verification, then security is enhanced, but authentication time is prolonged and network bandwidth is increased due to multiple round-trip exchanges

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiddata transmission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-configures multiple authentication factors and verification rules directly on computing devices. During authentication, devices locally evaluate all factors simultaneously without sequential server communication, completing multifactor authentication in a single transaction and eliminating multiple round-trip exchanges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables computing devices to autonomously perform security evaluations, authentication factor verification, and compliance checks using locally stored parameters. This self-service capability eliminates dependency on sequential server verification, reducing authentication time and network bandwidth consumption while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If a single set of protocols is used for all data transfers, then implementation is simple, but the system lacks flexibility to differentiate handling of information based on sensitivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity protocol flexibilityVSAvoidprotocol management
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent assigns different security parameters, authentication requirements, and routing rules to different computing devices based on their specific needs and data sensitivity. Each device receives customized security configurations from the central server, allowing differentiated security handling without requiring a completely complex centralized management system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a configuration parameter on the central server to dynamically adjust security protocols, authentication factors, and routing rules based on data sensitivity and device characteristics. This parameter-driven approach enables flexible security differentiation while maintaining manageable system complexity through standardized configuration mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If enhanced authentication procedures are implemented, then security of transaction requests is enhanced, but the need to transmit multiple factors of authentication causes extra round-trip exchanges and delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction securityVSAvoidauthentication delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-configures enhanced authentication factors and verification procedures directly on computing devices before transaction requests. When a transaction is initiated, the device locally completes all authentication verifications using pre-configured parameters, eliminating the need for multiple round-trip exchanges with the central server while maintaining enhanced security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments authentication functionality by placing verification logic and security parameters locally on computing devices rather than requiring centralized verification. This allows enhanced authentication procedures to execute autonomously and simultaneously, reducing authentication delay while maintaining transaction security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260046303A1Systems and methods for regulating data communication
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US20260046303A1 patent drawing
  • US20260046303A1 patent drawing
  • US20260046303A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatuses, methods, and computer program products are disclosed for updating configuration of computing devices. An example method includes receiving a set of update parameters and generating, based on the set of update parameters, an update instruction for a configuration table. The example method further includes distributing the update instruction to one or more computing devices respectively hosting local copies of the configuration table.