Local Video Feedback for Videoconferencing Quality Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current videoconferencing systems fail to provide accurate feedback to the local party about the video quality experienced by the remote party, leading to miscommunication and disruptive situations due to network artifacts, as the local party is unaware of the video distortion or loss seen by the remote party.

Innovation Solution

A video-feedback mechanism that predicts and degrades the local video quality to match the remote video quality, using network condition statistics and remote system information to automatically adjust the local video display, ensuring continuous feedback and adaptation to network conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the local video is displayed in high quality, then the local party can see themselves clearly, but the remote party experiences video degradation due to network conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocal video qualityVSAvoidremote video quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where network condition statistics and remote system information are continuously monitored and fed back to the local video processor. This feedback loop enables the local party to see a predicted version of how their video appears to the remote party, allowing them to adjust their behavior and communication style accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a copy of the local video that is degraded to match the remote video quality. This predicted video is generated by applying degradation algorithms that simulate network artifacts, packet loss, and compression effects. The degraded copy is then displayed alongside or instead of the original high-quality local video, giving the local party accurate feedback about remote reception.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Ease of operation

If network conditions are poor, then remote video quality degrades with artifacts, but the local party remains unaware of the degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocal party awarenessVSAvoidvideo quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors network conditions and provides real-time feedback to the local party through the predicted video display. This feedback mechanism makes the invisible network degradation visible to the local party, allowing them to understand why the remote video quality varies and adjust their communication accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system visually represents network quality degradation through changes in the predicted video appearance. As network conditions worsen, the predicted video shows increasing artifacts, blockiness, and quality degradation that mirror what the remote party experiences, making the abstract concept of network quality tangible and visible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

3Loss of information

If symbols or text messages are used for feedback, then network condition information is provided, but the actual video degradation is not captured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork condition informationVSAvoidvideo quality representation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using abstract symbols or text to represent network conditions, the system creates a visual copy of the local video that is degraded to match the remote reception quality. This visual copy accurately represents the actual video degradation including artifacts, blockiness, and quality loss, providing intuitive and precise feedback about remote video quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The invention inverts the traditional feedback approach by instead of showing the local party how the remote party sees them through abstract indicators, it directly presents a visual representation of the degraded video quality. This inversion makes the feedback more intuitive and accurate by showing the actual visual impact of network degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS8237764B1Local video feedback for videoconferencing
Publication Date: 2012.08.07 VSEE LAB
  • US8237764B1 patent drawing
  • US8237764B1 patent drawing
  • US8237764B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method enabling a local party to see how a remote party is viewing him/her during a videoconference is provided. This is accomplished by predicting and changing the local video to a similar video quality level as the video quality displayed with which the local video is displayed on a remote display. This process occurs without any input from the parties/user(s). Instead the prediction and changing of the local video occurs in an automatic fashion and continuously.