Local Voice Command Prediction for Privacy-Aware Device Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing digital assistants face challenges with privacy concerns due to voice data being sent to the cloud for processing, limited local processing capacity, and the need for wake words, which can detract from user experience.

Innovation Solution

A system that analyzes device state information to predict voice commands and intended devices within a localized network, leveraging interconnected devices for processing and minimizing cloud reliance, using local knowledge graphs and voice shortcuts to enhance accuracy and speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If voice data is sent to cloud for processing, then processing capability is improved, but privacy is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoice processing capabilityVSAvoidprivacy risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments voice processing into multiple stages: local preprocessing (wake word detection, basic command recognition) and selective cloud processing (complex queries, ambiguous commands). This segmentation allows the system to maintain privacy by keeping sensitive processing local while still leveraging cloud capabilities when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer (local processing unit) between the microphone and cloud server. This intermediary filters and pre-processes voice data locally, sending only necessary data to the cloud, thereby reducing privacy exposure while maintaining processing effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If all voice commands are processed locally, then privacy is improved, but processing capacity is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidvoice command processing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic processing capacity allocation where the system adapts between local-only mode, hybrid mode, and cloud-dependent mode based on device state, command complexity, and network availability. This dynamic approach allows the system to maximize local processing for privacy-critical operations while leveraging cloud resources when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary processing actions locally (wake word detection, basic intent recognition) before determining whether cloud processing is needed. This preliminary action reduces the burden on cloud resources and maintains privacy for routine operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If wake word is required for activation, then false triggering is reduced, but user experience is degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse trigger reductionVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different activation requirements to different devices and contexts: wake words are required for some devices but not others, and the requirement can change based on device state and environmental context. This localized approach maintains reliability where needed while improving ease of operation where appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts wake word requirements based on device state, user behavior patterns, and environmental context. The system learns when wake words are necessary and when they can be omitted, adapting to provide optimal balance between reliability and user experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If device state information is monitored continuously, then command prediction accuracy is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommand prediction accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic sampling of device state information rather than continuous monitoring. The system checks device states at intervals and triggers processing only when state changes occur or when prediction confidence thresholds are met, reducing energy consumption while maintaining prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary analysis of device state information to determine whether full processing is needed. The system identifies key state changes that warrant processing and filters out routine updates, reducing computational overhead and energy consumption while maintaining prediction accuracy for significant events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260018170A1Processing voice input in integrated environment
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 ADEIA GUIDES INC
  • US20260018170A1 patent drawing
  • US20260018170A1 patent drawing
  • US20260018170A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described for causing a device to perform an action based on a voice command. Devices connected to a localized network and capable of performing one or more actions based on one or more voice inputs may be identified, and device state information for each of the devices may be determined. The systems and methods may determine, based at least in part on the device state information, a predicted voice command, and a particular device of the plurality of devices for which the predicted voice command is intended. A voice input may be received, and based on receiving the voice input, the particular device may be caused to perform an action related to the predicted voice command.