Window and Sliding Door Frame Assembly with Localized Thickness
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing window and door frame assemblies face a trade-off between impact resistance, structural stability, and visibility, with thicker frames compromising viewing and thinner frames compromising stability.
Innovation Solution
A frame assembly with a reduced thickness relative to its width, enhancing visibility while maintaining stability through a larger width and additional structural elements like cover assemblies, support assemblies, and strengthening members.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Strength
If the frame thickness is increased to achieve impact resistance and structural stability, then the structural integrity is improved, but the visible area of the panel is reduced and viewing is obstructed
Solution Approach 1:
The frame employs different thickness dimensions at different locations: a first thickness for vertical portions and a second thickness for horizontal portions. This local differentiation allows the frame to achieve impact resistance where needed while minimizing visual obstruction in areas where thickness is more apparent, thereby resolving the contradiction between structural strength and visible panel area.
2Area of stationary object
If the frame thickness is decreased to maximize panel visibility and enhance viewing, then the visible area of the panel is increased, but the structural stability and impact resistance are compromised
Solution Approach 1:
The invention changes the thickness parameter of the frame based on its orientation and location. By setting the first thickness to be less than or equal to twice the second thickness, the frame achieves optimal balance between visibility and stability. This parameter optimization allows the frame to maintain structural integrity while maximizing the visible panel area.
3Stability of the object's composition
If the frame width is increased to maintain structural stability, then the stability is improved, but the aesthetic appeal and visibility are reduced
Solution Approach 1:
The frame design employs asymmetric width distribution: the vertical portions have a first width while horizontal portions have a second width, with the first width being greater than the second width. This asymmetric configuration provides enhanced structural stability in vertical load-bearing areas while maintaining aesthetic appeal by minimizing the width of horizontally visible portions.
Data Source
AI summary
A frame assembly, for use in window and door applications configured to retain a panel, comprising a frame with a cover assembly and a support assembly having a track assembly, and a sill assembly and a header assembly both interconnected to a securing surface. The cover assembly is interconnected to the support assembly. The sill assembly comprises a roller member disposed in supporting relation to the track assembly, and the header assembly is disposed in supporting relation to the support assembly so that the frame is movable relative to both the header assembly and the sill assembly. At least a portion of the frame comprises a predetermined thickness and a predetermined width. The predetermined thickness is substantially less than the predetermined width so that both cooperatively and concurrently enhance viewing through the panel and the frame's stability.