Locally-Flexible Enclosure Regions for Integrated Haptic Interfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electronic device enclosures with integrated user interface surfaces, such as trackpads, are structurally weakened due to openings, increasing manufacturing complexity and susceptibility to damage.

Innovation Solution

An electronic device enclosure with integrated force input/haptic output interfaces, featuring locally-flexible regions defined by reduced-thickness sections and support structures, where force transducers like piezoelectric elements induce bending moments to generate haptic outputs through the external surface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If an opening is created in the enclosure to accommodate a user interface surface, then the user interface functionality is enabled, but the structural integrity and durability of the enclosure are weakened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interface functionalityVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The enclosure is segmented into multiple layers: an external surface layer, an intermediate frame layer with locally-flexible regions, and an internal support structure. This segmentation allows the user interface surface to be integrated without compromising the overall structural integrity, as each layer performs its specific function independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The frame includes locally-flexible regions with reduced thickness specifically at the user interface location, while other regions maintain full thickness for structural support. This local quality variation enables the enclosure to provide both user interface functionality and structural strength in different areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If an opening is created in the enclosure for the user interface surface, then the user interface is accessible, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interface accessibilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The frame is merged with the enclosure structure, and the user interface surface is integrated directly into the frame's locally-flexible regions. This merging eliminates the need for separate openings and complex assembly steps, simplifying manufacturing while maintaining user interface accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The frame serves multiple functions: it provides structural support, integrates the user interface surface, and houses the haptic actuators. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components and simplifies the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If the enclosure thickness is reduced to integrate the user interface surface, then the user interface is accessible, but the susceptibility to damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interface accessibilityVSAvoiddamage susceptibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The enclosure maintains full thickness in most regions for durability, while locally-reducing thickness only in specific regions where user interface access is required. The locally-flexible regions are strategically positioned to provide access without compromising overall reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The frame structure with locally-flexible regions is pre-designed and pre-assembled into the enclosure before final assembly. This preliminary action ensures that the structural integrity is maintained while the user interface accessibility is built-in from the start, preventing later damage susceptibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances structural integrity while providing effective haptic feedback without compromising the enclosure's durability, simplifying manufacturing and reducing damage susceptibility.

Implementation Method 1

A force transducer (such as a piezoelectric element) is coupled to the support structure. As a result of this construction, an actuation of the force transducer induces a bending moment into the support structure to generate a haptic output through the external surface.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS12411551B2Enclosure with locally-flexible regions
Publication Date: 2025.09.09 APPLE INC
  • US12411551B2 patent drawing
  • US12411551B2 patent drawing
  • US12411551B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A force input/haptic output interface for an electronic device can include a force input sensor and a haptic actuator. In one example, the force input sensor and the haptic actuator are accommodated on a frame positioned below an input surface. In many examples, the frame includes relieved portions that redirect and/or concentrate compression or tension in the haptic actuator into the frame.