Location-Based Personal Assistant for Dynamic Schedule Coordination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current personal digital assistants (PDAs) do not effectively assist users in optimizing time and space planning, nor do they efficiently coordinate schedules and travel plans, especially in dynamic environments where unforeseen circumstances like traffic or meetings can disrupt plans.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent personal assistant that maintains a data structure representing the user's cognitive and contextual state, including location, motion, and preferences, to provide proactive suggestions and coordinate actions, such as travel adjustments and event scheduling, through autonomous communication with other devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If current PDAs are used for time and space planning, then basic scheduling functions are provided, but they cannot effectively optimize time and space planning or coordinate schedules and travel plans in dynamic environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to dynamic environmentsVSAvoideffectiveness in optimizing time and space planning
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts to changing user states by continuously monitoring location, motion, and contextual data. The personal assistant adjusts suggestions in real-time based on detected changes in user state, such as modifying travel recommendations when traffic conditions change or when the user's location indicates they are running late.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where user responses to suggestions are analyzed to refine future recommendations. The personal assistant learns from user interactions and adjusts its behavior accordingly, improving the effectiveness of time and space planning over time while adapting to individual user preferences and patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If manual schedule coordination is performed, then users have full control over their plans, but the burden of coordination increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of schedule coordinationVSAvoidtime spent on manual coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The personal assistant automates schedule coordination by autonomously analyzing user states, generating suggestions, and coordinating travel plans without requiring manual user intervention. The system handles the coordination burden itself, freeing users from time-consuming manual planning while maintaining control through review and approval of generated suggestions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis and preparation of schedule coordination options before user review. By pre-processing travel plans, event schedules, and potential conflicts, the personal assistant reduces the coordination burden to simple user decisions rather than full manual planning, significantly reducing time spent on coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If the PDA provides proactive suggestions based on user state, then time and space planning is optimized, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency in time and space planningVSAvoidcomplexity of state monitoring and analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The personal assistant integrates multiple functions including location tracking, motion detection, schedule management, and suggestion generation into a single unified system. By consolidating these diverse functions into one multi-functional assistant, the system achieves optimized time and space planning without proportionally increasing overall device complexity, as shared components serve multiple purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If the system autonomously communicates with other devices to coordinate actions, then schedule coordination efficiency improves, but communication protocol complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoordination efficiencyVSAvoidcomplexity of communication protocols
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The personal assistant serves as an intermediary that manages communication between different devices and systems. By centralizing communication protocols and data exchange through the assistant, the system achieves efficient coordination without requiring each device to implement complex communication logic, as the assistant handles protocol complexity centrally while maintaining simple interfaces for individual components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10237696B2Location-based assistance for personal planning
Publication Date: 2019.03.19 TAHOE RES LTD
  • US10237696B2 patent drawing
  • US10237696B2 patent drawing
  • US10237696B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for location-based assistance includes maintaining in a personal digital assistant (PDA) (22, 24, 26) a data structure that is indicative of a state of a user (32, 34, 36) of the PDA. Responsively to the state, a map (30) is generated in the PDA indicating targets (42, 44, 46, 48) within an area of relevance surround a present location of the user. Based on the map, the PDA provides a suggestion to the user of an action to be taken by the user with respect to one or more of the targets.