Location-Based Content Filtering for Merged Browsing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current MashUp editors require manual creation and uploading of combined web content, lacking efficient location-based filtering and advertising enhancements for enhanced user experience in merged browsing of network contents.

Innovation Solution

A system where client devices obtain geographic locations to filter and prioritize network content fragment suggestions based on location, with servers providing these suggestions and advertisements to clients for integrated browsing, allowing advertisers to specify and prioritize content for display.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If MashUp editors manually create and upload combined web content, then content can be displayed on web servers, but the process lacks efficiency and user experience is not enhanced with location-based filtering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent creation efficiencyVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs content aggregation, filtering, and MashUp creation without requiring manual editor intervention. Client devices automatically obtain geographic locations and receive filtered content suggestions from servers, eliminating the need for manual content assembly and upload processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The server pre-filters and prioritizes network content fragments based on geographic location before presenting them to users. This preliminary processing eliminates the need for manual content selection and preparation, significantly improving content creation efficiency while enhancing user experience through location-relevant content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If location-based filtering is implemented, then content relevance is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent relevanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The server acts as an intermediary that handles the complex task of location-based filtering and content prioritization. Client devices simply obtain their geographic location and receive pre-processed content suggestions, offloading the computational complexity to the server while maintaining high content relevance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If advertisers can specify and prioritize content, then targeted advertising is enabled, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadvertising targeting capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The server mediates between advertisers and users by processing advertising specifications and prioritizing content fragments accordingly. This centralized approach enables sophisticated targeted advertising capabilities while keeping client devices simple, as all complex advertising logic is handled on the server side.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10628853B2Location-based filtering and advertising enhancements for merged browsing of network contents
Publication Date: 2020.04.21 INTEL CORP
  • US10628853B2 patent drawing
  • US10628853B2 patent drawing
  • US10628853B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Location-based filtering and advertising enhancements for merged browsing of network content are described herein. In various embodiments, a client device may obtain its geographic location and provide that location to a server for filtering by the server of network content fragment suggestions based at least in part on the location. The client device may then receive some or all of the filtered suggestions for utilization in merged browsing. In some embodiments, a server may further receive an indicator of content being browsed. In response, the server may determine network content fragment suggestions, and may also determine an additional suggestion or prioritize a suggestion based an advertiser's interest. The server may then provide the suggestions and/or prioritization to the client device. In various embodiments, the server may also provide the advertisement(s) for display in a user interface of the client device along with the (prioritized) suggestions.