Location-Based Event Scheduling Conflict Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electronic calendaring systems fail to effectively manage and coordinate family activities across multiple locations, leading to scheduling conflicts, misunderstandings, and inefficiencies due to their static nature and lack of real-time location and traffic considerations.

Innovation Solution

A location-based event scheduling and coordination system that uses a host computing device to accept and analyze events at different locations, considering location-based information, travel times, weather, and traffic conditions to identify conflicts and automatically notify users, allowing for dynamic adjustments and recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional electronic calendaring systems are used to manage family activities, then basic scheduling functionality is provided, but scheduling conflicts occur and coordination efficiency deteriorates due to lack of location-based awareness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling coordination efficiencyVSAvoidscheduling conflict prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static calendar scheduling to dynamic location-based scheduling. It continuously monitors real-time location data, traffic conditions, and weather information to dynamically adjust event timing and provide conflict warnings, making the scheduling system adaptive to changing conditions rather than fixed and rigid

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously tracking user location, comparing it with scheduled event locations, analyzing traffic and weather conditions, and providing real-time notifications about potential scheduling conflicts. This closed-loop feedback enables proactive conflict prevention rather than reactive problem-solving

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple family members attend events at different locations, then individual activity participation is maximized, but travel time and scheduling conflicts increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual activity participationVSAvoidtravel time between events
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of potential scheduling conflicts by calculating travel times between events and considering traffic patterns in advance. It provides early warnings before conflicts occur, allowing family members to adjust their schedules proactively rather than discovering conflicts after they've already impacted their time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds spatial and environmental dimensions to traditional time-based scheduling. By incorporating location data, traffic conditions, and weather information, it creates a multi-dimensional scheduling framework that optimizes both individual participation and overall family coordination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If real-time location and traffic monitoring is implemented, then scheduling accuracy is improved, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system leverages existing multi-functional mobile devices and infrastructure that already provide location tracking, traffic information, and weather data. By utilizing these universally available resources rather than building dedicated systems, it achieves high scheduling accuracy without proportionally increasing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system acts as an intermediary layer that integrates and processes data from multiple external sources (location services, traffic APIs, weather services). This mediator approach allows the system to provide sophisticated scheduling accuracy while maintaining relative simplicity by relying on established external services rather than implementing complex monitoring infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10679191B2Personalized multi-user location-based event scheduling, management, and coordination systems and methods
Publication Date: 2020.06.09 MASTERCARD INT INC
  • US10679191B2 patent drawing
  • US10679191B2 patent drawing
  • US10679191B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A location-based event scheduling and coordination system includes at least one host computing device configured to accept from at least one user a first event and a second event at respectively different locations to be successively attended. The host computing device automatically considers location-based information for each of the first event and the second event to determine a possible scheduling conflict between the first event and the second event, and if a possible scheduling conflict is determined, automatically notifies the at least one user.