Location Based Network Access Management for Satellite Regulatory Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies do not provide efficient network selection and access control in cross-border scenarios, particularly in satellite access and backhaul situations, where regulatory compliance, emergency call routing, and lawful interception are challenging.

Innovation Solution

Implement location-based network access management through enhanced registration reject messages, network selection assistance information, and UE behaviors to ensure compliance with local regulations and facilitate network selection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If satellite coverage is used to provide mobile network access across multiple countries, then network coverage area is improved, but regulatory compliance complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesatellite coverage areaVSAvoidregulatory compliance complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the satellite network access by country borders by determining the UE's location country and comparing it with the PLMN's country code. This segmentation allows the system to apply country-specific regulatory rules, where the AMF rejects registration requests if the UE's location country does not match the PLMN's country code, thereby managing regulatory compliance complexity through structured segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If the AMF rejects registration requests with detailed cause values and network selection assistance information, then network selection efficiency is improved, but message complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork selection efficiencyVSAvoidmessage complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by including network selection assistance information in the REGISTRATION REJECT message before the UE needs to select a new PLMN. The AMF provides hints such as MCC or PLMN codes that guide the UE's subsequent network selection, allowing the UE to efficiently choose an appropriate network without extensive trial-and-error registration attempts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by providing the UE with specific cause values and network selection assistance information in the REGISTRATION REJECT message. This feedback loop enables the UE to understand why registration was rejected and what networks to try next, improving overall network selection efficiency through informed decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If the UE memorizes rejected PLMN information for extended periods, then network selection accuracy is improved, but device memory requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork selection accuracyVSAvoiddevice memory requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the UE's memorization of rejected PLMN information time-dependent and location-dependent. The UE stores rejected PLMN info with an associated timer and location context, automatically updating or clearing this information based on current location and elapsed time. This dynamic approach maintains high network selection accuracy while adapting memory usage to actual operational needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4197234B1Location based network access management
Publication Date: 2025.09.10 NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
  • EP4197234B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4197234B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4197234B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

There are provided measures for location based network access management. Such measures exemplarily comprise receiving a rejection message indicative of rejection of access of said mobile terminal to a first mobile network, checking for a cause of said rejection of access of said mobile terminal to said first mobile network, and affecting, if said cause of said rejection of access of said mobile terminal to said first mobile network is indicative of that said mobile terminal is not allowed to access to said first mobile network from a determined location of said mobile terminal, a selection of a second mobile network to be accessed based on a content of said rejection message.