Physical Location Reputation Scoring via Real-Time Data Aggregation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for assessing the safety of physical locations are often outdated and incomplete, leading travelers to be under or over-prepared for the actual conditions they will encounter.

Innovation Solution

A physical location rating management system that automatically calculates reputation scores by collecting and aggregating data from various sources, using keyword scoring and document classification to determine score adjustment factors, and storing them in a geospatial database for real-time updates and temporal applicability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If conventional research methods (travel guides, news sites, State Department advisories) are used to assess location safety, then travelers can obtain some information about destination safety, but the information is outdated and incomplete

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of safety informationVSAvoidtimeliness of safety information
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously collects data from multiple sources including news outlets, social media, and crime databases in real-time, maintaining an ongoing assessment of location safety rather than relying on periodic updates. This continuous data collection ensures information remains current and complete

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system processes user check-ins, reviews, and reports to continuously update reputation scores. User feedback loops provide real-time information about current conditions at destinations, allowing the system to adapt and refine safety assessments dynamically

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If travelers rely on conventional wisdom or previously held assumptions about location safety, then they can make quick decisions, but the information is likely inaccurate and not reflective of current conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of travel planningVSAvoidaccuracy of safety assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates and stores reputation scores for numerous locations in advance, so when travelers need safety information, it is immediately available without requiring real-time analysis. This preliminary computation enables quick access to accurate safety data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically collects, processes, and updates safety information without requiring manual research by travelers. The automated reputation scoring system continuously monitors and assesses locations, providing accurate information on-demand without traveler intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If multiple data sources are collected and processed in real-time to provide current safety information, then information completeness and accuracy improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of reputation scoresVSAvoidcomplexity of data processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the complex task of safety assessment into separate modules: data collection from multiple sources, text parsing and location identification, score adjustment factor determination through keyword scoring and document classification, temporal applicability assessment, and aggregation. Each module handles a specific aspect, making the overall system more manageable and maintainable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses intermediary processing layers including geospatial databases to store and organize location data, text parsing intermediaries to extract location information from unstructured data, and aggregation mechanisms to combine scores from multiple sources. These intermediaries simplify data flow between complex components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8751490B1Automatically determining reputations of physical locations
Publication Date: 2014.06.10 GEN DIGITAL INC
  • US8751490B1 patent drawing
  • US8751490B1 patent drawing
  • US8751490B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A physical location rating management system automatically calculates reputation scores for physical locations. A plurality of types of data concerning a plurality of physical locations are collected from a plurality of sources. It is determined to which specific physical location specific collected data pertains. Specific score adjustment factors quantifying adjustments to make to reputation scores are determined for multiple, specific physical locations, based on specific collected data. Score adjustment factors can be determined by, for example, performing keyword scoring and/or automated document classification of specific collected data. The determined score adjustment factors for each of the multiple, specific physical locations are aggregated, in real time, as the score adjustment factors are determined. Specific reputation scores for specific physical locations are calculated, based on the aggregated score adjustment factors for the specific physical locations.