Location-Based Risk Assessment for Service Transactions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for evaluating location-based risk associated with remote transaction requests are reactive and rely on customer reviews and historical data, failing to predict emerging hazards and being ineffective for new customers or locations without available data.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that generates a risk score for service provider transactions based on transaction data, location, and historical information, using machine-learning models to predict risks even in the absence of customer reviews, and automatically updates in real-time to account for emerging conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If customer review programs are used to evaluate service requests, then service providers can examine reviews and ratings from other providers, but the system is reactive and cannot predict emerging hazards or evaluate new customers without historical data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk evaluation accuracyVSAvoidability to evaluate new customers and locations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary risk assessment by analyzing transaction data patterns before service providers encounter actual risks. Machine learning models pre-process transaction data to identify emerging hazard patterns, enabling proactive rather than reactive risk evaluation. This allows the system to predict risks for new customers and locations by recognizing patterns in transaction data even when no customer reviews exist.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces machine learning models as an intermediary between raw transaction data and risk evaluation decisions. These models translate transaction data patterns into predictive risk assessments, serving as a mediator that enables evaluation of new customers without requiring traditional customer review data. The ML models bridge the gap between available transaction data and the need for reliable risk assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system relies on customer reviews and historical data, then risk assessments can be made for established customers, but the system fails for new customers or locations without available data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment dependabilityVSAvoidinability to assess new customers without reviews
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates proxy risk assessments for new customers by copying and analyzing transaction data patterns from similar established customers or locations. Instead of requiring direct review data from the new customer, the system infers risk characteristics by comparing transaction patterns against a database of known patterns from similar service providers and locations, effectively creating a surrogate evaluation mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the evaluation parameters from relying on customer review ratings to analyzing transaction data characteristics such as transaction frequency, location patterns, time of service, and service type. This parameter transformation enables reliable risk assessment for new customers by using objective transactional behavior data instead of subjective review data that may not exist for new customers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If traditional review systems are used, then existing customer data can be utilized, but the system cannot predict recently emerging hazardous conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk detection accuracyVSAvoiddelay in detecting emerging risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous monitoring and analysis of transaction data streams, rather than periodic review checking. Machine learning models continuously process incoming transaction data to detect emerging hazard patterns in real-time, ensuring uninterrupted surveillance of risk conditions. This continuous action enables immediate detection of emerging risks without the time delays inherent in periodic review systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes feedback loops where transaction data outcomes are continuously fed back into the machine learning models to refine risk predictions. When emerging hazardous conditions are detected through pattern analysis, the system generates feedback signals that update the models in real-time, improving detection accuracy progressively. This feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt to newly emerging risks while maintaining high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11354613B2System, method, and computer program product for generating location-based risk assessments of service provider transaction requests
Publication Date: 2022.06.07 VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION
  • US11354613B2 patent drawing
  • US11354613B2 patent drawing
  • US11354613B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described are a system, method, and computer program product for evaluating location-based risk associated with a remote transaction request. The method includes receiving, from a service provider system, a transaction request for a transaction between a user and the service provider system for a requested service, the transaction request identifying at least a location for the requested service. The method also includes generating a risk score for the transaction based at least partially on the transaction request, the location for the requested service, and historical transaction data. The method further includes communicating the risk score for the transaction to the service provider system. Communicating the risk score to the service provider system causes the service provider system to take at least one action based at least partially on the risk score for the transaction.