Location Safety Scoring for Ride-Sharing Pickups

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ride-sharing and transportation services lack the ability to determine safe pickup and drop-off locations and routes, especially in unfamiliar areas, as users have no way to assess safety factors such as surveillance presence, ambient light, and crime rates.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses computing devices to determine safety scores for locations and routes based on factors like surveillance cameras, ambient light, and crime rates, recommending the safest options to users through a networked system involving client devices and server-side safety determination systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional ride-sharing algorithms use historical data to determine pickup locations and routes, then common or popular spots are selected for efficiency, but safety considerations are not addressed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of pickup location and routeVSAvoidcomplexity of safety evaluation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety evaluation system is segmented into multiple independent components: surveillance camera detection, ambient light level measurement, GPS signal strength analysis, and crime rate data integration. Each component evaluates a specific safety aspect and contributes to an overall safety score, allowing the system to comprehensively assess location safety without requiring a single complex evaluation mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the system evaluates multiple safety factors (surveillance cameras, ambient light, crime rates) for each candidate location, then location safety is improved, but computational complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of safety assessmentVSAvoidcomplexity of safety evaluation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces intermediary components including mobile client applications that collect local safety data (surveillance presence, ambient light, GPS signal) and server-side processing systems that integrate this data with crime rate information. These intermediaries handle the complexity of multi-factor evaluation, allowing the core ride-sharing algorithm to receive simplified safety scores without directly managing the complexity of individual safety factor analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If real-time safety data collection and analysis is implemented for all candidate locations, then safety recommendation accuracy is improved, but system resource consumption and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of safety scoringVSAvoidlocation recommendation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements partial real-time evaluation by collecting safety data for a limited set of candidate locations rather than all possible locations. The mobile application collects real-time safety factors (surveillance cameras, ambient light, GPS signal strength) only for locations that are pre-identified as potential pickup spots based on historical data and current rider position, balancing measurement precision with processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11320280B2Location safety determination system
Publication Date: 2022.05.03 UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11320280B2 patent drawing
  • US11320280B2 patent drawing
  • US11320280B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for determining location data corresponding to a location of a user, retrieving candidate locations for pickup or drop-off locations based on the location data corresponding to the location of the user, and determining a safety score for each of the candidate locations. The systems and methods further select a best candidate location using the safety score associated with each of the candidate locations and provide a recommendation for a pickup or drop-off location comprising the best candidate location.