Automated Location Sensor Validation via Mobile Reference Target

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing inventory tracking systems require time-consuming and costly validation processes, relying on expert reviews and pre-planned paths, which are inefficient and prone to errors, especially in complex facilities with dynamic layouts.

Innovation Solution

A partially automated validation method using sensor data to determine the current location of a mobile reference target and select location sensors for inspection, providing real-time feedback and reducing reliance on expert review, allowing the system to function without adhering to a specific path.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If expert review and pre-planned paths are used for validation, then validation thoroughness is improved, but validation time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation thoroughnessVSAvoidvalidation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-validation by automatically comparing sensor data with the facility layout model without requiring expert reviewers. The validation controller autonomously determines whether sensors are functioning properly by analyzing whether expected tags are detected at expected locations, eliminating the need for manual expert inspection while maintaining validation thoroughness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual expert review process is replaced with an automated electronic validation system. The validation controller electronically compares sensor responses against the facility layout model and automatically generates validation results, substituting the mechanical process of expert review with an automated computational system that reduces time and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If expert review is used for validation, then validation accuracy is improved, but dependency on experts increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation accuracyVSAvoidexpert dependency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The validation system operates autonomously without requiring expert intervention. The validation controller automatically processes sensor data, compares it with the facility layout model, and generates validation results. This self-service approach maintains validation accuracy while completely eliminating dependency on experts for the validation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated feedback by continuously monitoring sensor responses and comparing them against expected values derived from the facility layout model. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures validation accuracy is maintained through systematic automated checking rather than subjective expert assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If pre-planned paths are required for validation, then coverage completeness is improved, but operational flexibility decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage completenessVSAvoidoperational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines coverage completeness by analyzing whether sensors detect expected tags at expected locations based on the facility layout model. This eliminates the need for pre-planned validation paths, allowing validators to move freely while the system autonomously assesses whether all sensors are properly covered and functioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The validation approach transitions from static pre-planned paths to a dynamic system that adapts to actual validator movement. The system processes sensor data in real-time and dynamically determines coverage completeness based on actual sensor responses, providing flexibility in how validation is performed while maintaining thoroughness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces validation time and costs by providing autonomous, real-time feedback, improving the accuracy of system validation and reducing the need for expert intervention, thus enabling faster deployment and scaling of inventory tracking systems.

Implementation Method 1

track the locations of items to which radio frequency identification (RFID) tags are affixed. To implement location tracking, location sensors such as RFID readers may be installed throughout the facility.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadio frequency identification (RFID): Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS11496867B2Automated validation of location tracking system
Publication Date: 2022.11.08 ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORP
  • US11496867B2 patent drawing
  • US11496867B2 patent drawing
  • US11496867B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of validating a set of location sensors deployed in a facility includes: receiving sensor data from at least a subset of the location sensors; generating a current location of a mobile reference target within the facility based on (i) the sensor data and (ii) expected positions corresponding to the location sensors; based at least on the current location: (i) selecting at least one of the location sensors, and (ii) setting an inspection indicator for the selected location sensor; presenting sensor status data including the inspection indicator via an output device associated with the mobile reference target; and repeating the generating, the selecting, the setting, and the presenting until inspection indicators have been set for each of the location sensors.