Location Validation via Physical Surroundings Imagery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for validating user device locations are susceptible to spoofing attacks, particularly in wireless communication, which can lead to unauthorized information access and financial losses, as they rely on GPS coordinates that can be easily manipulated.

Innovation Solution

A method that leverages real-time physical surroundings to validate user locations by requesting additional information such as images, sounds, and environmental conditions from the user device, comparing them with stored data, and verifying the location using imagery liveness detection and response time analysis to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If GPS coordinates are used to validate user device locations, then location validation is simple and fast, but the system is vulnerable to spoofing attacks and location manipulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation validation reliabilityVSAvoidvalidation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments location validation into multiple independent verification components: GPS coordinate checking, image capture validation, metadata analysis, and environmental consistency verification. Each component operates independently to verify different aspects of location authenticity, preventing spoofing attacks that might bypass a single validation method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces image metadata and environmental data as intermediary elements between the user device and the validation system. These intermediaries carry authenticating information (geotags, timestamps, EXIF data) that verify location without requiring direct trust in the device's location claims, thus resolving the contradiction between simple validation and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If additional verification information such as images and environmental data is collected, then location spoofing is prevented, but the system complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-spoofing capabilityVSAvoiddata collection and processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by collecting and storing image metadata, geotag information, and environmental data at the source (user device) before transmission to the validation system. This preliminary collection and organization of verification data reduces the processing burden on the central system and enables faster, more reliable spoofing detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the validation system analyzes received verification data and sends responses indicating whether location validation succeeded or failed. This feedback loop allows the system to dynamically adjust validation requirements and provides real-time security verification without requiring complex continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If real-time image capture and analysis is performed, then location verification accuracy improves, but the response time and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation verification accuracyVSAvoidvalidation response time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential verification elements from captured images (metadata, geotags, timestamps, key visual features) rather than analyzing entire high-resolution images. This extraction approach maintains location verification accuracy while dramatically reducing processing time and energy consumption, resolving the contradiction between precision and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If multiple validation checks are performed, then security against man-in-the-middle attacks improves, but the ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against attacksVSAvoiduser operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by automatically performing all validation checks (image capture, metadata extraction, geotag verification, environmental data comparison) without requiring user intervention. The system autonomously executes multiple security checks and presents a simple pass/fail result, maintaining high security while preserving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10573020B1Location validation through physical surroundings
Publication Date: 2020.02.25 GEN DIGITAL INC
  • US10573020B1 patent drawing
  • US10573020B1 patent drawing
  • US10573020B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for location validation through physical surroundings is described. In one embodiment, the method includes receiving a location of a user device, transmitting to the user device, a request for additional information, receiving the additional information from the user device in response to the request, the second identifier matching the first identifier, comparing the received additional information with stored data pre-associated with the received location, and verifying the received location based at least in part on the comparing. In some embodiments, the request for additional information includes at least one of a request for a first image captured at a first direction, a request for a second image captured at a second direction, a request for a third image captured at a pre-determined tilt angle, a request for a stream of images captured in a pre-determined pattern, or any combination thereof.