Lock Address Contention Predictor for Speculative Execution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In shared memory architectures, atomic access to memory locations can lead to data corruption when multiple threads access the same memory location simultaneously, and traditional locks can be costly in terms of processing time, causing delays and potential invalid data due to relaxed lock properties.

Innovation Solution

Implementing speculative locking mechanisms that predict lock address contention and temporal lock contention to determine whether to execute locks speculatively or non-speculatively, using lock address contention prediction (LACP) and temporal lock contention prediction (TLCP) to track and manage lock contention, thereby avoiding time penalties associated with flushing the execution pipeline.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional locks are used to ensure atomic access to memory locations, then data corruption is prevented, but processing time increases causing delays and potential invalid data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrityVSAvoidprocessing delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The lock execution mode is made dynamic by switching between speculative and non-speculative execution based on runtime conditions. The system monitors lock contention and automatically adjusts the locking strategy, transitioning from aggressive speculative execution to conservative non-speculative execution when contention is detected, thereby optimizing both speed and reliability adaptively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the execution parameter of lock instructions from always speculative to conditionally speculative based on contention history. By tracking whether a lock address has previously experienced contention and adjusting the speculative execution parameter accordingly, the system resolves the contradiction between speed and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If speculative locking is used to reduce processing time, then execution speed improves, but data corruption risk increases due to relaxed lock properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution speedVSAvoiddata integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary monitoring of lock addresses to detect prior contention events before executing speculative locks. By tracking contention history in advance and using this information to predict future contention, the system can proactively decide whether to enable or disable speculative execution, preventing data corruption before it occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by monitoring actual lock contention events and using this information to adjust future lock execution behavior. When contention is detected during speculative execution or in historical data, the system feeds this information back to modify the speculative execution strategy, thereby maintaining data integrity while preserving performance benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If lock address contention prediction is implemented to optimize lock execution, then processing delays are reduced, but device complexity increases due to additional monitoring circuitry

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelock execution delayVSAvoidmonitoring mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lock contention prediction functionality is merged with the existing lock execution pipeline by integrating prediction logic directly into the lock instruction handling path. The monitoring circuitry is combined with the execution pipeline so that contention detection and speculative execution decisions occur within the same processing flow, minimizing additional complexity while maximizing performance benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11868818B2Lock address contention predictor
Publication Date: 2024.01.09 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
  • US11868818B2 patent drawing
  • US11868818B2 patent drawing
  • US11868818B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for selectively executing a lock instruction speculatively or non-speculatively based on lock address prediction and/or temporal lock prediction. including methods an devices for locking an entry in a memory device. In some techniques, a lock instruction executed by a thread for a particular memory entry of a memory device is detected. Whether contention occurred for the particular memory entry during an earlier speculative lock is detected on a condition that the lock instruction comprises a speculative lock instruction. The lock is executed non-speculatively if contention occurred for the particular memory entry during an earlier speculative lock. The lock is executed speculatively if contention did not occur for the particular memory entry during an earlier speculative lock.