Lock Body Single Spring Piston Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing lock body electric motor arrangements require precise installation of two springs, which is difficult and costly, and can lead to imbalance in spring forces, complicating the assembly and increasing production costs.

Innovation Solution

A single spring is used to replace the two-spring system, with vanes on the piston and counterpart overlapping and surrounded by the spring, allowing the spring to store potential energy and push the piston either outwards or inwards, facilitating easier installation and balancing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If two springs are used in the electric motor arrangement, then the piston can be pushed in both directions, but the installation becomes difficult and costly with potential force imbalance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepiston bidirectional movementVSAvoidspring installation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the functions of two separate springs (pushing piston outward and inward) into a single spring system. The single spring is arranged to act on the piston through a mechanical arrangement that enables bidirectional force application, thereby reducing component count and installation complexity while maintaining the required bidirectional movement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single spring performs multiple functions: it provides the outward pushing force on the piston, serves as a structural element in the motor arrangement, and enables bidirectional control through its mechanical linkage. This multi-functional design eliminates the need for separate springs for each direction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If two springs are used in the electric motor arrangement, then the piston can be pushed in both directions, but production costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepiston bidirectional movementVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges two separate spring components into a single spring component, directly reducing parts count and associated manufacturing costs. This consolidation eliminates the need for purchasing, storing, and managing two separate spring inventories, thereby reducing production costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts one spring from the system, removing the unnecessary component while retaining the essential bidirectional functionality through the redesigned single spring arrangement. This extraction eliminates the cost associated with the redundant spring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If two springs are used in the electric motor arrangement, then the piston can be pushed in both directions, but assembly becomes complicated with precision requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepiston bidirectional movementVSAvoidspring installation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines two separate spring installation procedures into a single spring installation process. The single spring is designed with features that facilitate easier positioning and securing, reducing the precision requirements and simplifying the assembly process compared to coordinating two separate springs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Ease of operation

If two springs are used in the electric motor arrangement, then the piston can be pushed in both directions, but force balance becomes difficult to achieve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepiston bidirectional movementVSAvoidspring force balance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the force generation functions into a single spring system where the spring's mechanical arrangement inherently provides balanced forces in both directions. The single spring's design and positioning ensure symmetrical force application, eliminating the difficulty of balancing two separate springs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution simplifies the assembly process, reduces production costs, and ensures symmetrical action in both directions, making the electric motor arrangement suitable for various lock body types with improved piston travel distance and reduced risk of incorrect installation.

Implementation Method 1

The spring is arranged to store potential energy during a guiding state of the electric motor, wherein the movement of the piston is at least partially impeded, and to push the piston away from or towards the electric motor when the piston is able to move

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic potential energy storage: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS10508470B2Lock body
Publication Date: 2019.12.17 ABLOY OY
  • US10508470B2 patent drawing
  • US10508470B2 patent drawing
  • US10508470B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a lock body having an electric motor. The electric motor is arranged to guide the forming and removing of a force transmission connection between the parts to be arranged in the force transmission connection to transfer force or to impede force transfer. If formation of the force transmission connection is not achieved, the construction of the invention is such that the use of one spring enables the pushing of the piston connected to the electric motor both outwards and inwards.