Lock Clustering for Software Transactional Memory

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional software transactional memory systems incur significant performance overhead due to frequent lock acquisitions and releases, particularly involving high-latency atomic instructions like compare-and-swap operations, which hinder efficient concurrent access management in shared-memory environments.

Innovation Solution

A lock-clustering compiler identifies frequently accessed data structures and associates them with a single software transactional memory lock, reducing the number of lock acquisitions and releases by optimizing lock management through static and dynamic analysis, and just-in-time compilation, while also declustering when contention arises.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If traditional lock management is used in software transactional memory systems, then each memory area is mapped to a single lock for simple access coordination, but the number of lock acquisitions and releases increases significantly, causing high performance overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelock management complexityVSAvoidsystem performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies lock clustering to merge multiple locks into clusters, where multiple memory areas that are frequently accessed together are mapped to a single lock. This reduces the total number of lock acquisitions and releases by grouping related memory areas, thereby decreasing the overhead of atomic instructions while maintaining concurrency control effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If frequent lock acquisitions and releases are performed to ensure atomicity, then transaction correctness is maintained, but high-latency atomic instructions like compare-and-swap are executed repeatedly, increasing system overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction atomicityVSAvoidlock operation latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By clustering memory areas into groups that share common locks, the system reduces the frequency of atomic lock acquisition and release operations. This maintains transaction atomicity for accessed memory areas while reducing the number of high-latency compare-and-swap instructions executed, thereby decreasing overall system overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Productivity

If lock clustering is implemented to reduce lock operations, then the number of atomic instructions is decreased, but the system must monitor memory access patterns and determine clusters dynamically, adding runtime complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelock operation efficiencyVSAvoidruntime monitoring complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs static analysis during compilation to pre-determine memory access patterns and identify clusters of memory areas that are frequently accessed together. This preliminary classification allows the system to assign locks in advance without requiring complex runtime monitoring, thereby reducing runtime complexity while maintaining lock operation efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If memory areas are accessed together frequently, then grouping them into clusters reduces lock acquisitions, but incorrect clustering can cause contention and reduce concurrency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcurrency performanceVSAvoidaccess pattern accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates runtime monitoring that tracks actual memory access patterns and provides feedback to the lock clustering mechanism. This feedback allows the system to adjust cluster assignments dynamically, ensuring that memory areas accessed together remain in the same cluster while avoiding incorrect groupings that would cause contention, thereby maintaining both concurrency performance and access pattern accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8677331B2Lock-clustering compilation for software transactional memory
Publication Date: 2014.03.18 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US8677331B2 patent drawing
  • US8677331B2 patent drawing
  • US8677331B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A lock-clustering compiler is configured to compile program code for a software transactional memory system. The compiler determines that a group of data structures are accessed together within one or more atomic memory transactions defined in the program code. In response to determining that the group is accessed together, the compiler creates an executable version of the program code that includes clustering code, which is executable to associate the data structures of the group with the same software transactional memory lock. The lock is usable by the software transactional memory system to coordinate concurrent transactional access to the group of data structures by multiple concurrent threads.