Motor Vehicle Lock Control Drive Override Variants

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing motor vehicle lock systems face challenges in efficiently implementing variant formations for the override function, which is cost-intensive due to the need for different components and complex production logistics.

Innovation Solution

The motor vehicle lock system allows for different mechanical locking states to be set with identical locking instructions but varying mechanical parameterizations, adjustable through control drive positions, enabling the implementation of single-pull and double-pull override functions purely through control technology, eliminating the need for multiple components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If different components are provided for single-pull and double-pull override functions, then the functional requirements of different customers are met, but the production engineering effort and logistical costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverride function variantsVSAvoidproduction engineering effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

A single control drive unit is designed to perform multiple functions by adjusting its control position. The control drive can be positioned to enable either single-pull override function or double-pull override function, eliminating the need for separate components for each variant. This multi-functionality approach allows one component to serve multiple purposes based on configurable parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The override function variant is determined by changing the control position parameter of the control drive rather than using different physical components. By adjusting the control position, the same control drive unit can implement different override functions (single-pull or double-pull), thus reducing production complexity and logistical requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If different components are provided for single-pull and double-pull override functions, then the functional requirements of different customers are met, but the logistical effort within production process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverride function variantsVSAvoidparts logistics
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control drive unit is designed as a universal component that can implement both single-pull and double-pull override functions. This eliminates the need for maintaining separate inventory streams for different override function components, thereby simplifying parts logistics and reducing device complexity in the production process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the functionality of separate single-pull and double-pull override components into a single control drive unit. By combining these functions into one component with adjustable control positions, the system reduces the number of unique parts that need to be managed in logistics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of manufacture

If control positions of control drive are used to adjust mechanical parameterizations, then variant formation can be programmed electronically, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction process simplificationVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes in the control position of the control drive to achieve different mechanical parameterizations. This allows electronic programming of variant formation while keeping the control system relatively simple, as it only requires positioning adjustments rather than complex control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3059362A1Motor vehicle lock
Publication Date: 2016.08.24 BROSE SCHLIESSSYSTEME GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3059362A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3059362A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3059362A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a motor vehicle lock with locking elements such as a latch (1) and a locking pawl (2), with a locking mechanism (4) and with an actuating lever (5, 6), wherein the locking mechanism (4) can be brought into different mechanical locking states and has a control drive (7) for this purpose, wherein each locking state is assigned a locking instruction, and wherein the locking instruction defines whether the motor vehicle lock can be opened by actuating the actuating lever (5, 6). It is proposed that at least one locking state can be set to different mechanical parameters with identical locking instructions, and that the different parameters of the locking state can be set by moving the control drive (7) to different control positions.