Lock With Dual Electromagnets For Emergency Release

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing panic locks lack the ability to switch between closed-circuit and working current principles, which limits their functionality in emergency situations, such as power failures or unauthorized access control.

Innovation Solution

The lock incorporates a mechanism that allows switching between closed-circuit and working current principles using a selector switch, with an arrangement of two electromagnets and a pivotally mounted magnet armature, enabling selection between these modes of operation. Additionally, it includes an energy storage device for delayed unlocking and a damping mechanism for quiet operation, along with an external electromagnet placement to avoid door-line obstructions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the lock uses a single control principle (closed-circuit or working current), then the control system is simple, but the adaptability to different emergency situations is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different emergency situationsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into two separate electromagnets (first electromagnet for closed-circuit principle, second electromagnet for working current principle) instead of using a single control mechanism. This allows the lock to switch between different control principles by activating different electromagnets, thereby improving adaptability to various emergency situations while keeping each individual electromagnet relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is made dynamic by introducing a selector switch that can change the operational mode between closed-circuit and working current principles. The magnet armature is pivotally mounted to dynamically switch between being acted upon by the first electromagnet or the second electromagnet, allowing the system to adapt its behavior based on the selected principle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the electromagnet is placed inside the lock, then the control is integrated, but the door lines are obstructed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor line clearanceVSAvoidelectromagnet arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The electromagnet is extracted from the traditional internal lock position and placed externally on the door. This external placement removes the electromagnet from the path of door lines, clearing the door line area while still enabling effective magnetic actuation of the magnet armature through the door structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If the operating handle is actuated before release, then the unlocking can initiate, but the energy is lost without effect

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunlocking reliabilityVSAvoidenergy loss from premature actuation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The release is activated in advance before the operating handle is actuated. When the release is triggered (either automatically or manually), it prepares the locking mechanism by disengaging the latch from the bolt before the handle is pushed. This preliminary action ensures that when the handle is subsequently actuated, the unlocking occurs smoothly without energy loss from premature or ineffective actuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances the lock's functionality by allowing automatic release in power failures, secure access control, and quiet operation, while ensuring the door can be opened safely in emergencies, with options for remote or central control and reduced noise during unlocking.

Implementation Method 1

The lock has a control device for the release, which works according to the working current principle, i.e. to release the lock, the control device, e.g. an electromagnet, is energized.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnet: Electromagnet

Implementation Method 2

The control device can also work according to the quiescent current principle. The lock is locked when the control device, e.g. the electromagnet, is energized.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnet: Electromagnet

Implementation Method 3

A spring is arranged between the magnet armature and the selector switch, with the switching between operation according to the closed-circuit principle or according to the working current principle taking place by changing the direction of tension of the spring using the selector switch.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 4

A damping mechanism for quiet operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDamping: Damping

Data Source

PatentEP2385194B1Lock
Publication Date: 2018.02.28 GEZE GMBH
  • EP2385194B1 patent drawingFigure 1~4
  • EP2385194B1 patent drawingFigure 5
  • EP2385194B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

The lock (1) has an actuating handle (9) e.g. door handle and panic bar, coupled with a lock mechanism to actuate a latch (8) and/or a bar (7) using a loaded spring (15). A release device includes a releaser (19) that interacts with a release lever (18) for blocking and releasing a door handle lever (12). A control device is provided with two electromagnets that are arranged to each other at a specific angle, where the electromagnets comprise a common swivel-mounted magnet armature. A selector switch chooses an operation mode based on a closed circuit principle and an open circuit principle.