Electromechanical Lock Entrainer Control Against Hammer Blow Opening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electromechanical locks with automatic locking functions are susceptible to unauthorized opening attempts, particularly through methods like the 'hammer blow', compromising security.

Innovation Solution

The electromechanical lock incorporates an entrainer that can be selectively rotated into a standby position to allow automatic locking and a blocking position to prevent unauthorized opening, using a control circuit to manage the electric motor and entrainer positions, ensuring the latch remains secured in the locking position unless intentionally released.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If the latch is preloaded in the direction of the locking position to enable automatic locking, then the automatic locking function is improved, but the security against unauthorized opening attempts deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic locking functionVSAvoidsecurity against unauthorized opening
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The entrainer is designed with multiple selectable positions (standby position, release position, blocking position) that can be dynamically switched between based on operational requirements. This dynamic configuration allows the system to adapt its locking behavior - enabling automatic locking during normal operation while providing enhanced security blocking when needed to prevent unauthorized opening attempts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameter of the entrainer by selecting different positions (standby, release, blocking) to alter the latch's behavior. In the blocking position, the entrainer actively prevents the latch from moving to the unlocking position, thereby changing the security parameter while maintaining the automatic locking function through proper parameter selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Extent of automation

If the latch is released to be urged back against the preload from the locking position to enable automatic locking, then the automatic locking function is improved, but the susceptibility to hammer blow attacks increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic locking functionVSAvoidsusceptibility to hammer blow attacks
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The entrainer is configured to perform a preliminary blocking action by moving into the blocking position, where it actively prevents the latch from being moved to the unlocking position. This preliminary anti-action counteracts the harmful hammer blow attack by establishing a protective barrier before any unauthorized forcing can succeed, while still allowing the automatic locking function to operate when the entrainer is in the standby position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Reliability

If the entrainer is configured to block the latch against movement into the unlocking position to enhance security, then the security against break-open attempts is improved, but the ease of operation for authorized users deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against break-open attemptsVSAvoidease of opening and closing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The entrainer's position is made dynamic and selectable between standby, release, and blocking positions. For authorized users, the system can be configured to be in the standby position where automatic locking operates smoothly, or switch to the release position to facilitate easy opening. The blocking position is only activated when security enhancement is specifically required, thereby maintaining ease of operation during normal use while providing security when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design provides enhanced security against unauthorized opening attempts while maintaining convenience by allowing authorized users to easily open and close the lock without mechanical keys, using a control circuit to manage the entrainer positions.

Implementation Method 1

an electric motor (25) for driving the entrainer (23)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the latch (21) is preloaded in the direction of the locking position (V)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS12492578B2Electromechanical lock
Publication Date: 2025.12.09 ABUS AUGUST BREMICKER SOEHNE KG
  • US12492578B2 patent drawing
  • US12492578B2 patent drawing
  • US12492578B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electromechanical lock includes an electromechanical locking mechanism and a control circuit, wherein an associated counter-piece is locked by way of the locking mechanism. The locking mechanism has a latch, an entrainer that is rotatable about an axis of rotation for driving the latch, and an electric motor for driving the entrainer, wherein the latch is moveable between a locking position and an unlocking position, wherein the latch is preloaded in the direction of the locking position. The entrainer is rotatable into a release position, a standby position, and a blocking position and the latch can is driven to perform a movement into the unlocking position by rotating the entrainer into the release position. In the standby position, the latch is released to be urged back against the preload. In the blocking position, the entrainer blocks the latch against a movement in the direction of the unlocking position.