Lockable Detector Storage for Mobile X-ray Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mobile x-ray apparatus designs lack efficient transportation, deployment, and operation capabilities, particularly in ICU settings, and do not provide secure storage solutions for radiographic detectors, which are essential for ensuring the detectors remain with the system.

Innovation Solution

A mobile radiography apparatus with a moveable transport frame, adjustable support structure, and a lockable detector storage unit that includes a sliding bar and actuator mechanism to securely store and restrict removal of radiographic detectors, allowing for multiple locking and unlocking positions to accommodate various detector sizes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a mobile radiography apparatus is designed with secure storage for detectors, then the security and reliability of detector storage is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector storage securityVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is divided into separate functional components: a locking bar with locking surfaces, engaging portions on the bar, and corresponding engaging portions on the detector storage unit. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while working together to provide secure storage, resolving the contradiction between reliability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking bar is positioned within the detector storage unit structure, with locking surfaces and engaging portions nested within the overall assembly. The actuator mechanism is integrated into the locking bar structure, creating a compact nested arrangement that provides secure storage without excessive external complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If a locking mechanism is added to secure detectors, then the security of detector storage is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector storage securityVSAvoiddetector access convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism features self-latching engaging portions that automatically engage when the locking bar moves to the locked position, eliminating the need for separate locking actions. The actuator directly moves the locking bar, which in turn moves the engaging portions into engagement, creating a self-service system that is both secure and easy to operate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The locking bar is designed to move dynamically between locked and unlocked positions through the actuator mechanism. The engaging portions are positioned to engage and disengage smoothly during this movement, allowing quick transition between states while maintaining security when locked, thus improving ease of operation without compromising reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the locking mechanism is made robust to prevent detector removal, then the security is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector storage securityVSAvoidlocking mechanism structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking surfaces on the locking bar are positioned asymmetrically relative to the engaging portions, creating a one-way locking action where the bar can easily move to engage the locking surfaces but requires significant force to move backward. This asymmetric design provides robust security through the mechanical advantage of the geometry rather than through complex multi-component mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple locking positions are provided for different detector sizes, then the adaptability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector size accommodationVSAvoidlocking mechanism configurations
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking bar is designed with multiple locking surfaces at different positions along its length, and the engaging portions are positioned to engage with corresponding features on detectors of various sizes. This universal design allows the same locking mechanism structure to accommodate different detector configurations without requiring additional components or complex reconfiguration, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8622614B2Locking device for mobile X-ray system
Publication Date: 2014.01.07 CARESTREAM HEALTH INC
  • US8622614B2 patent drawing
  • US8622614B2 patent drawing
  • US8622614B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mobile radiography apparatus has a moveable (e.g., wheeled) transport frame and an adjustable column mounted at the frame. A boom apparatus supported by the adjustable column can support an x-ray source and can be coupled to a optional second display (also adjustably mounted). Embodiments of methods and/or apparatus by which mobile radiography carts can provide a securable storage for at least one radiographic detector by blocking at least a portion of a path traveled by the at least one radiographic detector when removed from storage at the mobile radiography apparatus.