Lockable Electronics Cabinet With Sequential Door Motion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronics cabinets lack an efficient mechanism for secure access and electromagnetic shielding while maintaining break-in resistance, as they often require complex hinge systems and additional space for hinges, which can compromise security and ease of installation.

Innovation Solution

A lockable electronics cabinet design featuring a door that moves in a sequence of linear and rotational motions, utilizing internal pivot axes and separate rotational joints, along with a linear motion mechanism driven by guiding tracks, allowing for a robust and secure sealing mechanism with reduced external space requirements, and optional electromagnetic shielding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional hinge systems are used for door attachment, then the door can be opened and closed, but the mechanism requires additional external space for hinges and becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor opening mechanismVSAvoidhinge system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the hinge function and pivot axis into a single integrated mechanism. The pivot axis is positioned inside the door leaf rather than being a separate external hinge, combining what would traditionally be separate components into one unified system that reduces overall complexity and external space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The pivot axis is nested within the door leaf structure itself, with the pivot axis extending through the bulk of the door. This nesting eliminates the need for separate external hinges and reduces the overall mechanism complexity while maintaining the door opening function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Ease of operation

If traditional hinges are positioned externally on the door, then the door can rotate, but external space adjacent to the door is occupied by the hinge mechanism

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor rotation capabilityVSAvoidspace adjacent to door
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The traditional external hinge mechanism is extracted and replaced by an internal pivot axis system. The pivot axis is positioned inside the door leaf rather than being mounted externally, which removes the hinge mechanism from the external space adjacent to the door while preserving the rotational opening capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The pivot axis extends through the bulk of the door in the thickness dimension rather than being positioned on the external surface. This dimensional repositioning allows the door to rotate without requiring external lateral space, as the rotation axis is now embedded within the door's own volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Strength

If the door is secured with a heavy construction for break-in resistance, then security is improved, but the door mechanism becomes more difficult to operate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebreak-in resistanceVSAvoiddoor operation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The door operation is segmented into two distinct phases: linear motion phase and rotational motion phase. The linear motion mechanism handles the heavy door by providing mechanical advantage through guiding members and engaging members, while the rotational phase uses the pivot axis. This segmentation allows the heavy door to be operated more easily by distributing the effort across different motion types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The linear motion mechanism acts as an intermediary between the user and the heavy door. The guiding members and engaging members provide a mechanical interface that reduces the effort needed to move the heavy door during the linear motion phase, making operation easier while maintaining break-in resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the door is designed to open 180 degrees or more, then access to the cabinet interior is improved, but the door may collide with adjacent cabinets or be constrained by the cabinet body

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor opening angleVSAvoidcollision with cabinet body
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The linear motion mechanism moves the door in the lateral dimension away from the cabinet body before rotation occurs. This dimensional shift creates clearance that allows the door to rotate 180 degrees or more without colliding with the cabinet body or adjacent cabinets, as the door's path is now in a different spatial plane.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The linear motion phase is performed as a preliminary action before the rotational motion. By first translating the door away from the cabinet body and adjacent structures, the path for subsequent rotation is cleared, preventing collisions and enabling wider opening angles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3424285B1Lockable electronics cabinet
Publication Date: 2022.10.26 HANS ERIK JOHANSSON I HAGSTAD AB
  • EP3424285B1 patent drawingFigure 1a
  • EP3424285B1 patent drawingFigure 1b
  • EP3424285B1 patent drawingFigure 1c~1d

AI summary

A lockable electronics cabinet (1) comprises a body and a door. The door is arranged to be opened in a sequence of motions, comprising, first, a linear motion perpendicular to the plane of the door, then, a rotational motion around a pivot axis.