Adjustable Pressure Limiting Valve With Lockable Spring Setting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing adjustable pressure limiting (APL) valves face challenges in achieving accurate and consistent maximum limit pressure due to variations in spring force and manufacturing tolerances, leading to potential underperformance or overperformance in gas flow regulation.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a first valve cap that adjusts the spring force and a second valve cap that locks in place to prevent further adjustment, allowing for precise setting and adjustment of the maximum pressure during assembly and use, while ensuring the pressure remains within a predetermined range.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a slightly stronger spring is used to ensure all valves achieve the target pressure, then the reliability of achieving minimum target pressure is improved, but the maximum limit pressure becomes too high and the valve may not open at all

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of achieving target pressureVSAvoidmaximum limit pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The valve cap is made rotatable to allow dynamic adjustment of the spring compression, transforming a static pressure setting into a dynamically adjustable parameter. This enables each valve to be individually tuned to achieve the exact target pressure despite spring force variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The adjustable valve cap allows changing the compression parameter of the spring to optimize the pressure setting. By rotating the cap, the compression distance is modified, which directly changes the spring force and thus the valve opening pressure, enabling precise control over the maximum limit pressure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the spring force is increased to compensate for manufacturing tolerances, then the consistency across valves is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates as higher pressure is needed to open the valve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of valve performanceVSAvoidease of opening the valve
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The rotatable valve cap provides a dynamic adjustment mechanism that allows operators to fine-tune the spring compression after assembly. This compensates for manufacturing tolerances in spring force while maintaining ease of operation by allowing post-assembly optimization of the opening pressure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If the maximum limit pressure is set during manufacture with a fixed stop, then the device complexity is reduced, but the manufacturing precision requirement increases to achieve reliable threshold across batches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplexity of pressure setting mechanismVSAvoidprecision of threshold pressure setting
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure setting function is segmented into two independent parts: a fixed stop that defines the maximum rotation limit (simple manufacturing) and an adjustable valve cap that allows precise pressure tuning (operational flexibility). This segmentation reduces manufacturing precision requirements while maintaining device simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If the valve cap is made adjustable to allow pressure tuning, then the adaptability is improved, but the device complexity increases due to additional adjustment mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to adjust pressure settingVSAvoidcomplexity of valve structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The valve cap serves multiple functions: it compresses the spring to set the pressure, it can be rotated to adjust the compression amount, and it prevents over-compression through the fixed stop. This multi-functionality provides adaptability without requiring separate adjustment mechanisms, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables accurate and consistent setting of the maximum pressure threshold, accommodating variations in springs and manufacturing tolerances, ensuring reliable operation across different valves and batches, while allowing for adjustable pressure settings during use.

Implementation Method 1

the biasing force from the biasing element can be increased by rotating a part of the valve top to compress the spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP3990809B1An adjustable valve
Publication Date: 2023.05.10 INTERSURGIGAL AG
  • EP3990809B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3990809B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3990809B1 patent drawingFigure 4A~4B

AI summary

The present invention relates to adjustable flow control valves, for example to an Adjustable Pressure Limiting (APL) valve. The adjustable valve (2) described comprises a valve body (4) comprising a valve seat (6), a valve member (10) movable relative to the valve seat (6), a first valve cap (20), a second valve cap (50) and a biasing element (30) to bias the valve member (10) away from the first valve cap (20). The first valve cap (20) is movable to increase the biasing force applied by the biasing element (30). The second valve cap (50) is engageable with the first valve cap (20) to prevent such movement of the first valve cap (20) beyond a selected position, but to allow movement of the first valve cap (20) in an opposite direction, way from said position.