Rotationally Locked Forceps Shafts With Jaw Over-Travel Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional medical devices, such as forceps, face challenges in reducing packaging space, simplifying design and manufacturing, enhancing user experience, increasing stability, and preventing damage during use.

Innovation Solution

The development of a medical device with a handpiece that includes a rotatable, openable, and closeable end effector, featuring a drive shaft motion transfer assembly with a rotational actuator and a force-limiting mechanism to prevent over-travel and protect the jaws from damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If conventional forceps design is used, then manufacturing and packaging are straightforward, but packaging space is excessive and design complexity cannot be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging spaceVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drive shaft is rotatably received within the outer shaft, creating a nested configuration where one shaft is housed inside another. This nesting arrangement reduces the overall volume of the forceps device, allowing for more compact packaging while maintaining the functional independence of each shaft component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The motion transfer assembly serves multiple functions: it transfers rotational motion from the handpiece to the end effector, provides rotational locking between shafts, and enables independent rotation of the outer shaft relative to the drive shaft. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components, simplifying design while reducing packaging space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If the outer shaft is allowed to rotate independently, then user experience and operational flexibility are improved, but stability and potential for damage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidstability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The force-limiting mechanism dynamically adjusts the interaction between the outer shaft and drive shaft. During normal operation, the outer shaft can rotate independently for flexibility. When excessive force is detected, the mechanism engages to provide rotational locking, preventing damage while maintaining operational flexibility throughout the range of motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The force-limiting mechanism is pre-configured to prevent over-rotation and excessive forces before they can cause damage. By establishing these protective constraints in advance, the system maintains stability and reliability while still allowing the outer shaft to rotate independently within safe operational parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Reliability

If rotational locking is implemented between shafts, then stability is increased, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The rotational locking function is merged with the motion transfer mechanism itself. The same interface that transfers rotational motion from the handpiece to the end effector also provides the locking capability between the outer shaft and drive shaft. This integration eliminates the need for separate locking components, reducing manufacturing complexity while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If a force-limiting mechanism is added, then damage prevention is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage preventionVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The force-limiting mechanism is merged with the rotational interface between the outer shaft and drive shaft. The same mechanical interaction that enables motion transfer and rotational locking also provides the force-limiting function. This multi-functional integration prevents damage without adding separate complex mechanisms, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20240390021A1Forceps including rotationally locked shafts
Publication Date: 2024.11.28 GYRUS ACMI INC
  • US20240390021A1 patent drawing
  • US20240390021A1 patent drawing
  • US20240390021A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Medical devices, such as forceps including a handpiece having a housing and an inner shaft that extends out of the handpiece along a longitudinal axis to transfer motion to an end effector. The inner shaft being rotatable with respect to the handpiece. An outer shaft that is rotatable with respect to the housing is loated around the inner shaft. The medical device further including an end effector coupled to the inner shaft and the outer shaft. The outer shaft rotationally constrained to the inner shaft at a first longitudinal location and at a second longitudinal location.