Locking and unlocking kinetic motion of a mop base

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mop base kinematic locking and unlocking systems fail to balance stability, ease of use, and interference-free operation during cleaning, particularly when attaching or detaching the mop and using a wringer, lacking a single intuitive control mechanism that prevents accidental operation.

Innovation Solution

A hinged kinematic system with a lever and elastic elements, where the lever is contained within the mop base profile, using a tooth and groove configuration to maintain stability and facilitate easy opening and closing, allowing foot-operated unlocking and ensuring the system does not interfere with wringer usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a kinematic locking system is added to the mop base, then stability of the mop base in open and closed positions is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of mop baseVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lever is nested within the profile of the mop base when closed, and only protrudes when open. The tooth-groove locking mechanism is integrated into the existing half-frames structure. This nesting approach provides stability through the locking mechanism while minimizing visual and physical complexity by hiding components within the mop base profile.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The elastic element automatically returns the lever to the locked position after unlocking, and the tooth-groove mechanism automatically engages to lock the base in place. This self-service characteristic reduces the need for additional control mechanisms and simplifies the overall device while maintaining stable positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If a protruding control mechanism is used for locking/unlocking, then ease of operation is improved, but interference with wringer operation occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidinterference with wringer
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The lever dynamically changes its position relative to the mop base profile - remaining nested when closed and only protruding when open for control. This dynamic positioning allows easy foot operation when needed while eliminating interference with the wringer during cleaning operations, as the lever retracts into the profile.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If the lever remains exposed for easy access, then ease of operation is improved, but accidental activation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidaccidental activation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The lever is extracted from continuous exposure and only becomes accessible when the mop base is in the open position. When closed, the lever is nested within the profile and inaccessible, preventing accidental activation. When open, it protrudes for easy foot operation, thus separating the accessibility function from constant exposure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If multiple controls are provided for locking/unlocking, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple functions are merged into the single lever mechanism: it acts as the unlocking control, the return spring provider, and the positioning indicator. The tooth-groove mechanism combines locking and positioning functions. This merging reduces device complexity while maintaining reliability through the integrated multi-functional design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides a reliable, intuitive, and interference-free mechanism for locking and unlocking the mop base, allowing easy mop replacement and wringer use without protruding obstacles, ensuring stability and ease of operation from any side, preventing accidental activation.

Implementation Method 1

pushed by elastic elements (9) to rotate towards the top half-frame (4)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

interfering with its profile when said second half-frame returns to a closed state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical interference:

Implementation Method 3

hinged to the lower half-frame (3), with the axis (8) parallel to the reciprocal hinging axis (5) of the half-frames that make up the mop base (1)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHinge mechanism: Hinge

Data Source

PatentUS9820628B2Locking and unlocking kinetic motion of a mop base
Publication Date: 2017.11.21 THERMTECS
  • US9820628B2 patent drawing
  • US9820628B2 patent drawing
  • US9820628B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Improved mop base capable of using both surfaces of a normal mop arranged parallel to one another.