Child-Resistant Locking Cap for Laminated Rollerball Tubes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current containers for hazardous materials do not effectively prevent children from accessing the contents, as they lack a secure locking mechanism that is resistant to child manipulation.

Innovation Solution

A container made of rolled laminated plastic or metal with a flexible sidewall and a child-resistant locking assembly that includes a rollerball applicator, where the locking cap requires alignment and rotation of locking teeth with mating members to open, preventing easy access by children.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a simple cap is used on the container, then the device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but child resistance is compromised and safety is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of cap removalVSAvoidchild resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism changes the operational parameters by requiring a specific rotational movement and alignment action that differs from simple cap removal. The cap must be rotated to align locking teeth with slots, transforming the opening operation from a simple pull-off action to a controlled sequence of actions that children cannot perform instinctively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The locking teeth and slots act as an intermediary mechanism between the cap and container body. This intermediary component requires specific alignment and rotational movement to engage or disengage, creating a barrier that prevents direct cap removal while maintaining adult usability through proper alignment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a locking assembly with alignment requirement is added, then child resistance is improved and safety is enhanced, but device complexity increases and ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild resistanceVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is segmented into distinct functional components: locking teeth on the cap, corresponding slots on the container, and a rotational alignment requirement. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function while maintaining overall simplicity - the teeth provide locking, the slots provide guidance, and the rotation provides the child-resistant barrier

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If the sidewall is made flexible and squeezable, then the applicator can dispense material effectively, but the structural strength and containment security are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial dispensingVSAvoidcontainer structural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The container utilizes a flexible sidewall made of laminated material that can be squeezed to force precautionary material onto the applicator. The laminated construction provides necessary strength and containment security while the flexible nature allows easy dispensing through squeezing motion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The sidewall is constructed from laminated material combining multiple layers that provide both flexibility for squeezing and sufficient structural strength for containment. The composite structure allows the material to be both strong enough to contain hazardous substances and flexible enough to enable easy dispensing through compression

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a secure and safe dispensing mechanism for hazardous materials by ensuring that children cannot easily remove the cap, thereby reducing the risk of accidental exposure to harmful substances.

Implementation Method 1

The locking cap includes at least one, and preferably a pair, of locking teeth. The front wall of the container has at least one mating locking member to be engaged by the at least one locking tooth

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Fastener: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 2

The plastic is selected from the group consisting of polypropylene, polyethylene or combinations including one or more of these plastics. An important feature of the present invention is for a sidewall of the container, regardless of shape, to be flexible and squeezable so that the precautionary material is forced onto (or into depending on the applicator) the applicator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS10343827B2Child-resistant locking cap for laminated tubes
Publication Date: 2019.07.09 INNOVATIVE PRODUCT BRANDS INC
  • US10343827B2 patent drawing
  • US10343827B2 patent drawing
  • US10343827B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A combination of a container made out of rolled laminated plastic or rolled laminated metal combined with a rollerball applicator, combined with a child-resistant locking assembly between the container and a cap removably affixed to the container. The container includes a closed rear end, a front wall and a flexible sidewall between the closed rear end and the front. The flexible sidewall is in a shape selected from the group consisting of oval-shaped, elliptical-shaped and cylindrical-shaped.