Multi-Point Locking Device Independent Secondary Lock Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing locking devices with main and secondary locks are vulnerable to operational failures due to warping or unauthorized manipulation, as they are coupled together, leading to compromised safety and reliability.

Innovation Solution

A locking device design where the main lock and secondary locks are coupled via separate drive rods with connecting pieces, allowing independent operation and distribution along the door or window height, ensuring secure locking even if one secondary lock is damaged or manipulated.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the main lock and secondary locks are coupled together by connecting rods, then the locking device can be operated together with simple structure, but if one lock blocks during closing due to warping or manipulation, the other locks cannot be closed completely, compromising safety and reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking reliabilityVSAvoidlocking device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking device is segmented into independent locking units (main lock and secondary locks) that are spatially separated and can operate independently. Each lock has its own locking element and drive mechanism, allowing one lock to function even if another is blocked or manipulated, thereby improving reliability without requiring a completely complex interconnected structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the main lock and secondary locks are spatially separated and can be operated independently, then security is maintained even if one lock is compromised, but the structural complexity increases with separate drive rods and connecting pieces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity reliabilityVSAvoiddrive mechanism structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system is divided into independent locking units with separate drive mechanisms. Each secondary lock has its own drive rod that can be actuated independently from the main lock, allowing spatial separation and independent operation. This segmentation ensures that compromise of one lock does not affect the others, maintaining security reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Connecting pieces serve as intermediaries that allow the drive rods to pass through the forend structure. These connecting pieces with passages enable the drive mechanisms to transmit force through the forend without direct connection between locks, facilitating independent operation while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If multiple secondary locks with different locking elements are used, then unauthorized manipulation is made more difficult and security is enhanced, but the device complexity and number of components increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against manipulationVSAvoidnumber of locking elements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different locking elements are assigned to different secondary locks based on their specific functions and positions. The first secondary lock has a locking element of the first type (e.g., hook-shaped) while the second secondary lock has a locking element of the second type (e.g., ball-shaped). This local differentiation enhances security against various manipulation methods while keeping each individual locking element relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The locking device employs a composite approach by combining different types of locking elements (hook-shaped, ball-shaped, or other variants) within the same system. This diversity in locking element types creates multiple barriers against unauthorized manipulation, enhancing overall security reliability without requiring each individual element to be overly complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentEP3070238B1Locking device for a door or a window
Publication Date: 2018.08.22 GRETSCH UNITAS GMBH BAUBESCHLAGFABRIK
  • EP3070238B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3070238B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3070238B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A locking device (10), in particular a multi-point locking device (10), for a door or window, comprising a main lock (12) for actuation, at least one first secondary lock (14) with a locking element (34) of a first type and with a faceplate (20) for fastening, wherein the first secondary lock (14) is coupled to the main lock (12) and can be actuated by the main lock (12), is designed and further developed with regard to reliable operation using simple structural means such that at least one second secondary lock (16) with a locking element (36) of a second type is provided and that the second secondary lock (16) is coupled to the main lock (12) and can be actuated by the main lock (12) independently of the first secondary lock (14).