Locking Device Multiple Authentication Methods

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic locksets require a mobile device or key fob for access, posing a problem when these devices are unavailable, as users cannot unlock or lock doors without them.

Innovation Solution

An auxiliary authentication input device with a keypad and wireless communication unit is integrated into the lockset, allowing users to input authentication codes without needing a phone or key fob, using a controller to electronically control the lock's mechanical assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If electronic locksets use wireless communication with mobile devices or key fobs for authentication, then security is improved, but usability deteriorates when the user does not have these devices

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidaccessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The lockset system is designed to support multiple authentication methods including wireless communication with mobile devices/key fobs and direct keypad input. This multi-functionality ensures that users can access the door through various means, maintaining security while improving accessibility when primary devices are unavailable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The keypad serves as an intermediary authentication device that allows direct input of authentication codes without requiring mobile devices or key fobs. This intermediary mechanism bridges the gap between wireless authentication and manual input, ensuring continuous access capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If electronic locksets require mobile devices or key fobs for authentication, then security is enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is designed to handle multiple authentication protocols including wireless communication and direct keypad input. By integrating these functions into a single controller, the system achieves enhanced security through multiple authentication methods while avoiding the need for separate complex subsystems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If electronic locksets provide keyless operation with mobile devices, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates when devices are unavailable

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveconvenienceVSAvoidaccess reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows dynamic switching between different authentication modes (wireless vs. keypad) based on availability. When mobile devices are unavailable, the authentication parameter changes from wireless communication to direct keypad input, maintaining access reliability while preserving the keyless convenience where applicable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11580803B2Locking device with multiple authentication devices
Publication Date: 2023.02.14 ASSA ABLOY AMERICAS RESIDENTIAL INC
  • US11580803B2 patent drawing
  • US11580803B2 patent drawing
  • US11580803B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A locking device with a bolt movable between a locked position and an unlocked position. The locking device includes an electronic controller for selectively controlling movement of the bolt between the locked and unlocked position. At least two input devices are provided, such as a keypad, a biometric input, etc., which communicate an authentication code to the controller. The controller controls movement of the bolt based on a valid authentication code received from any of the at least two input devices.