Locking Differential Engagement Sensing for Split-Mu Traction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional open differentials fail to provide adequate traction on split-mu surfaces, leading to wheel slippage and reduced vehicle performance, especially when one wheel encounters a slippery road while the other is on dry pavement.

Innovation Solution

A locking differential assembly with a lock ring and plunger mechanism that allows both wheels on an axle to rotate at the same speed, utilizing a non-contacting sensor to detect the engagement status of the lock ring and provide an electrically detectable signal for electronic control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a locking differential is used to prevent wheel slippage and improve traction, then vehicle performance on split-mu surfaces is improved, but tire scuffing in turns increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetractionVSAvoidtire scuffing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The differential lock mechanism is made dynamically controllable, transitioning between locked and unlocked states based on driving conditions. The system uses sensors to detect wheel slip conditions and automatically actuates the lock ring to engage or disengage, allowing the differential to adapt its behavior rather than being permanently fixed in one state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameter of the differential by altering the engagement state of the lock ring. When wheel slippage is detected, the plunger actuates to move the lock ring into engagement, changing the differential from an open state (allowing speed difference) to a locked state (forcing equal speed), thereby controlling traction levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a non-contacting sensor is used to detect plunger position, then measurement reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement status detectionVSAvoidsensor system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical contact-based position detection system is replaced with a non-contacting sensor system. Instead of using mechanical switches or contacts that would wear and fail, the invention uses optical, magnetic, or capacitive sensors to detect the plunger's position and the lock ring's engagement status without physical contact, thereby improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The non-contacting sensor acts as an intermediary between the mechanical components (plunger and lock ring) and the electronic control system. The sensor translates the mechanical position into an electrical signal without direct mechanical contact, serving as a mediator that improves system reliability while maintaining the mechanical integrity of the differential components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances traction by ensuring both wheels apply maximum torque, allowing vehicles to climb hills and improve performance in conditions like drag racing and snow plowing, while preventing tire scuffing during turns.

Implementation Method 1

A non-contacting sensor is connected to the differential case. The non-contacting sensor is located a fixed, predetermined distance from the differential case. The non-contacting sensor is to detect a proximity of the plunger to the non-contacting sensor and to output an electrically detectable signal indicative of the engagement status of the lock ring.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNon-contacting sensor detection:

Data Source

PatentUS11326679B2Locking differential assembly
Publication Date: 2022.05.10 EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LTD
  • US11326679B2 patent drawing
  • US11326679B2 patent drawing
  • US11326679B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A locking differential assembly (10) includes a differential case (12). A lock ring (40) is selectably engagable with a first side gear (18, 20) to selectably prevent the first side gear (18, 20) and a second side gear (18, 20) from rotating relative to the differential case (12). A plunger (30) is translatable along a plunger axis (55) through a bore (68) in the differential case (12). The plunger (30) is to be in contact with the lock ring (40) at least when the lock ring (40) is engaged with the first side gear (18, 20). A position of the plunger (30) relative to the differential case (12) along the plunger axis (55) is indicative of an engagement status of the lock ring (40). A non-contacting sensor is connected to the differential case (12) and located a fixed, predetermined distance from the differential case (12). The sensor is to detect a proximity of the plunger (30) to the sensor and to output an electrically detectable signal indicative of the engagement status of the lock ring (40).