Selectively Disengageable Rotary Knob for Stable Settings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Rotary control mechanisms, such as potentiometers and rotary encoders, are prone to inadvertent adjustments due to accidental bumps, leading to disruptions and inconvenience in audio equipment settings, particularly during transportation or when multiple controls are arranged in close proximity.

Innovation Solution

A selectively-disengageable rotary controller locking knob assembly that includes a hub, a knob with a radial slot, and a biasing member, which securely fastens to the rotary controller shaft, preventing unintentional rotation by engaging a base with a circumferential engagement arrangement, allowing intentional adjustments when needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a rotary controller (potentiometer or rotary encoder) is left unlocked for easy adjustment, then the ease of operation is improved, but the stability of the setting is worsened due to accidental bumps or inadvertent adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of adjustmentVSAvoidstability of setting
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism transitions between locked and unlocked states dynamically. The knob can be pushed axially to engage or disengage the locking elements, allowing the system to switch between stable (locked) and adjustable (unlocked) states as needed, resolving the contradiction between stability and ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The biasing member (spring) pre-loads the locking elements into the engaged position, creating a preliminary locking action that prevents inadvertent adjustments. The user must deliberately overcome this preliminary locking force by pushing the knob axially to unlock it, thus preventing accidental changes while maintaining ease of intentional adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Stability of the object's composition

If a locking mechanism is added to prevent inadvertent adjustments, then the stability of the setting is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of settingVSAvoidcomplexity of locking mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is merged with the existing knob structure. The locking elements are integrated into the knob body, and the biasing member is housed within the same assembly, eliminating the need for separate locking components and reducing overall device complexity while maintaining stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The locking elements and biasing member are nested within the knob structure. The locking pins are housed in recesses within the knob, and the spring is contained within the same space, creating a compact integrated assembly that adds stability without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Stability of the object's composition

If the knob is made securely locked to prevent movement, then the stability of the setting is improved, but the ease of operation for intentional adjustments is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of settingVSAvoidease of intentional adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is designed to be dynamically switchable. The user can easily transition from the locked stable state to the unlocked adjustable state by simply pushing the knob axially, making intentional adjustments straightforward while maintaining stability when locked

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Stability of the object's composition

If multiple engagement arrangements are added to prevent relative rotational movement, then the stability of the setting is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of settingVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The engagement arrangements use asymmetric tooth profiles and corresponding gear teeth that are simple to machine. The locking elements have asymmetric shapes that naturally engage with the gear teeth in one direction, providing stable locking while using conventional manufacturing methods for the asymmetric features

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Prevents unwanted changes to rotary controller settings, ensuring that perfected settings remain unchanged, reducing the need for frequent recalibration and minimizing disruptions, while allowing intentional adjustments when required.

Implementation Method 1

a biasing member arranged within the knob and structured and arranged to bias the first engagement arrangement into contact with the second engagement arrangement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

A post is threadedly engaged with the radial bore so as to secure the hub to the shaft of the rotary controller

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScrew: Screw

Data Source

PatentUS10691158B2Locking knob
Publication Date: 2020.06.23 LIVOLSI ANTHONY
  • US10691158B2 patent drawing
  • US10691158B2 patent drawing
  • US10691158B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rotary controller selectively-disengageable locking knob assembly, including a hub having a longitudinal axis and an axial bore extending at least partially through the inner hub along the longitudinal axis, wherein the axial bore is configured to receive a shaft of a rotary controller arranged in or on a device surface. The hub includes a radial bore extending from an outer surface of the hub to the axial bore, wherein the radial bore is perpendicular to the axial bore. A knob is concentrically disposed about at least a portion of the hub, wherein the knob includes at least one central bore structured to receive at least a portion of the hub, a radial slot alignable with the radial bore, and a circumferential bottom surface having a first engagement arrangement. The knob is axially moveable on the hub to selectively disengage the first engagement arrangement from contact with the second engagement arrangement.