Locking Mechanism With Opposite-Thread Drive

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing locking mechanisms for aircraft applications require a balance between reliability and lightweight design, often failing to provide a secure and efficient locking solution that is both robust and compact.

Innovation Solution

A locking mechanism featuring a base with arcuate arms and rotatable locking elements that move between retracted and extended positions, driven by a rotary shaft with opposite threads, allowing for simultaneous movement of locking elements in opposite directions to securely retain a shaft across a 360° arc.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional locking mechanisms are used to ensure reliability, then security is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking reliabilityVSAvoidmechanism weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is divided into two separate locking elements (10, 12) that operate independently but symmetrically, each engaging with the shaft (24) at different positions. This segmentation allows for a more distributed and reliable locking action while using lighter individual components compared to a single massive locking element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking elements (10, 12) are designed with arcuate shapes that follow the curvature of the shaft (24), allowing them to wrap around and secure the shaft effectively. This curved geometry provides reliable retention through contact over an arc (approximately 90 degrees each) while using minimal material, reducing weight compared to straight or blocky locking components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Reliability

If locking elements are positioned to provide full 360° retention, then security is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretention securityVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The two locking elements (10, 12) are positioned asymmetrically around the shaft (24), with each element engaged at different angular positions. This asymmetric arrangement provides comprehensive 360-degree coverage while maintaining simple individual element designs and straightforward actuation through the single drive shaft (50).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The drive shaft (50) combines two opposite-handed threaded portions (54, 56) into a single component, allowing simultaneous actuation of both locking elements (10, 12) from one actuator. This merging simplifies the control system while achieving comprehensive security coverage through coordinated movement of multiple locking elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If locking elements move through large arcs for full engagement, then retention reliability is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement reliabilityVSAvoidguide channel precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The guide channels (32) in the arms (6, 8) are formed as arcuate channels that guide the locking elements (10, 12) through their rotational movement. The curved geometry of these channels naturally accommodates the arcuate motion path, reducing the need for extremely precise linear guidance while ensuring reliable engagement through the full arc of movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The arcuate guide channels (32) and arcuate locking elements (10, 12) work together where the geometry of the channels themselves provides the guidance and constraint necessary for reliable engagement. The design uses the natural geometry of curved paths to ensure proper alignment and engagement without requiring additional precision-machined features or complex adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The mechanism provides a lightweight, reliable locking solution that securely retains a shaft across a full 360° arc, ensuring robust retention while minimizing weight and preventing inadvertent movement.

Implementation Method 1

The drive comprises a rotary drive shaft having a right handed thread portion for driving one locking element and a left handed thread portion for driving the other locking element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThreaded engagement: Screw

Data Source

PatentUS10597915B2Locking mechanism
Publication Date: 2020.03.24 HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP
  • US10597915B2 patent drawing
  • US10597915B2 patent drawing
  • US10597915B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A locking mechanism comprises a base comprising a pair of arms projecting therefrom and defining an open mouthed recess for receiving a member to be selectively retained in the recess. The mechanism further comprises a pair of locking elements mounted between said pair of arms for rotational movement between a retracted position in which they permit access to the recess and an extended position in which they extend at least partially across the mouth of the recess. The arms comprise respective guides to guide the movement of said locking elements between said retracted and extended positions. The mechanism further comprises a drive for simultaneously moving the locking elements in opposite rotational directions. The drive may comprise a drive shaft having left handed and right handed threaded portions.