Removable Locking Pins for Wearable Device Housing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wearable devices face a challenge in reconciling a sleek design with the need to accommodate increasing features, as thicker devices are required to support additional functionality, compromising their aesthetic appeal.

Innovation Solution

The use of removable locking pins that fit into receiving channels to secure the front and rear housings of wearable devices, allowing for a slim profile without occupying internal space, and are hidden from view to maintain appearance, while also being cost-effective and simplifying assembly by being outside the water seal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If traditional fasteners (screws, snaps) are used to secure housings, then the device can be assembled, but internal space is occupied and appearance is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinternal spaceVSAvoidhousing connection
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The locking pin system extracts the fastening function from the internal volume of the device. By positioning locking pins in receiving channels on the external surface of the housing, the connection mechanism is removed from the internal space, allowing maximum volume for battery and components while maintaining secure housing attachment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The locking pins act as intermediary elements that mediate between the front and rear housings. These pins extend into receiving channels and provide the connecting function without requiring internal fasteners, thus preserving internal volume while ensuring reliable housing connection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Shape

If visible fasteners are used, then assembly is simplified, but the sleek appearance is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesleek appearanceVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The locking pins are strategically positioned in receiving channels that are located in non-visible areas of the housing. This local placement allows the fastening function to be performed in areas where visibility is minimal, maintaining the sleek appearance while enabling straightforward assembly and manufacturing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If locking pins are positioned inside the water seal, then housing connection is secured, but assembly complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehousing connectionVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking pin system is extracted from the water seal assembly, positioning it externally where it can perform the housing connection function without interfering with water sealing components. This separation simplifies both the water seal design and the overall assembly process while maintaining secure housing attachment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS9436163B2Locking pins for a wearable device
Publication Date: 2016.09.06 GOOGLE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC
  • US9436163B2 patent drawing
  • US9436163B2 patent drawing
  • US9436163B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are removable “locking pins” that hold the front and rear housings of a wearable device together. These pins fit into receiving channels in the walls of the housings. Unlike screws or other fasteners, these pins do not take up space needed for internal components of the device. Unlike snaps, the pins are usable with housings that are very rigid (e.g., metal or ceramic). In some embodiments, the pins are entirely hidden from view, and thus they do not detract from the appearance of the device. Also in some embodiments, the pins fit entirely outside of a water seal for the device, thus reducing cost and assembly complexity.