Multi-Stage Locking Verification Mechanism for Safety Harnesses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current locking mechanisms, particularly those with two-stage locking verification, are vulnerable to bypassing in dangerous applications such as releasing a worker from a safety harness, posing a risk to safety.

Innovation Solution

A locking mechanism incorporating mechanical (one-stage) and electro-mechanical (two-stage) verification with two and three-point unlocking means, featuring a receiver base, pivotable locking tabs, and electronic components like magnetic actuators and reed switches, which provide secure engagement and status signaling through a steel or nylon harness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a simple locking mechanism is used, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability is worsened due to vulnerability to bypassing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is divided into multiple independent verification stages: a first verification stage with a first set of locking elements and a second verification stage with a second set of locking elements. Each stage must be successfully completed for full engagement, preventing bypassing while maintaining operational clarity through distinct engagement steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism requires preliminary verification actions before final locking engagement. The first verification stage must be completed (providing initial confirmation of proper engagement) before the second verification stage can occur, ensuring that safety conditions are met before full locking occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If a two-stage locking verification mechanism is implemented, then reliability is improved, but device complexity is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple locking verification functions are merged into a single integrated connector assembly. The first and second verification stages, along with their respective locking elements and indicators, are combined in one compact device that connects two objects simultaneously, avoiding the need for separate locking mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The connector assembly performs multiple functions within a single device: it provides mechanical locking, visual engagement indication, and multi-stage verification capabilities. This universal design consolidates what could be separate systems into one multi-functional component, reducing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If visual engagement indicators are added, then measurement precision is improved for verifying locking status, but device complexity is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking status verification accuracyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Visual engagement indicators utilize color changes or positional changes of indicator elements to communicate locking status. Different colors or positions indicate different engagement states (e.g., engaged vs. disengaged), providing precise visual feedback without requiring complex electronic or mechanical signaling systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances safety by ensuring secure engagement and status notification, preventing accidental disengagement in critical safety scenarios, thereby protecting human life and equipment.

Implementation Method 1

The subject matter may further include electronic components including three magnetic actuators and corresponding electronic switches that signal change of state. The two second arms of the locking tabs and a leading edge of the insert respectively include the three magnetic actuators. The electronic switches, which may be magnetically activated reed switches, signal status change to an external controller

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentEP3619381B1Locking mechanism with multiple stage locking verification
Publication Date: 2022.07.06 CONTROL DYNAMICS INC
  • EP3619381B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3619381B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3619381B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system and method for a locking mechanism that includes an ability to indicate proper engagement via a signal cable coupled through a harness. The locking mechanism may include electronic components including three magnetic actuators and corresponding electronic switches that signal change of state. Locking tabs and a leading edge of the insert respectively include the three magnetic actuators. The electronic switches, which may be magnetically activated reed switches, signal status change to an external controller and, optionally, an external computer. Further, status signals and power signals may be routed through a steel cable or woven nylon harness that coupled the locking mechanism to a local anchor point. Change of status notification may be important on critical safety worksites where lack of mechanical and electronic connection can be life threatening.