Lockout Forward Flip Lever Power Saw Switch Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing circular saws with lockout power switches are uncomfortable and inconvenient to operate, making it difficult for users to maintain both switch elements in the engaged position during cutting operations, which can lead to inadvertent energization of the electric motor.

Innovation Solution

A saw assembly with a housing, drive member, motor, switch, trigger, lockout lever, and stop structure, where the lockout lever is pivotable between a lockout and non-lockout position, preventing accidental activation of the trigger and allowing ergonomic operation by ensuring the switch is only engaged when intended.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a lockout power switch with two switch elements is used, then the electric motor is protected from inadvertent energization, but the operation becomes uncomfortable and inconvenient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of inadvertent energizationVSAvoidcomfort and convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The power switch is divided into two distinct elements: a trigger element and a lockout element. The trigger element can be actuated independently to start the motor, while the lockout element must be engaged to maintain the motor running. This segmentation allows the trigger to be positioned for easy access (improving ease of operation) while the lockout element provides the safety function (improving reliability).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A spring mechanism acts as an intermediary between the trigger element and the lockout element. When the trigger is released, the spring automatically returns it to the off position, ensuring the motor cannot restart without deliberate user action. This intermediary mechanism provides automatic safety feedback while requiring minimal user effort, resolving the contradiction between safety and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If both switch elements must be maintained in engaged position, then safety is improved, but user comfort and convenience deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiduser comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The lockout element is designed with a spring mechanism that automatically returns the trigger to the off position when released. This dynamic behavior means the user only needs to actively hold the lockout element engaged, not both elements simultaneously. The system adapts its state based on user input, providing safety through automatic reset while maintaining ease of operation during the cutting process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spring mechanism is pre-loaded to automatically return the trigger to the off position. This preliminary action ensures that after each trigger press, the system automatically resets to a safe state, eliminating the need for the user to manually return the trigger and reducing the physical burden during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If the trigger is easily accessible, then ease of operation is improved, but the risk of accidental activation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccessibilityVSAvoidaccidental activation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The power activation function is segmented into two independent elements: the trigger element for starting and the lockout element for maintaining operation. The trigger can be positioned for easy accessibility while the lockout element provides an additional safety barrier. This segmentation allows the trigger to be ergonomically positioned without increasing accidental activation risk, as the lockout element must also be engaged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lockout element acts as a preliminary anti-action mechanism that prevents the motor from running unless deliberately engaged. Even if the trigger is accidentally actuated, the motor cannot run unless the lockout element is also engaged. This preliminary protective action counteracts the potential harmful effect of easy trigger accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS8640345B2Lockout forward flip lever for power saw
Publication Date: 2014.02.04 ROBERT BOSCH TOOL
  • US8640345B2 patent drawing
  • US8640345B2 patent drawing
  • US8640345B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A saw assembly includes a housing, a drive member, a motor, a switch, a trigger, a lockout lever, a stop structure, and a lock-on member. The housing defines an interior space, and has a forward housing portion defining a forward housing opening and a rearward housing portion defining a rearward housing opening. The drive member extends through the forward housing opening, and is configured to be moved in a repeating pattern. The motor is positioned in the interior space and is configured to move the drive member in the repeating pattern. The switch is positioned in the interior space and has an actuator movable between an actuated and a deactuated position. When the switch is in the actuated position, the motor moves the drive member in the repeating pattern, and when the switch is in the deactuated position, the motor does not move the drive member in the repeating pattern.