Cylindrical Lockset Knob Catch Spring and Torque Plate Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cylindrical locksets are bulky, expensive, and lack desired strength, durability, and versatility, with cantilever-type knob catch assemblies often providing inadequate handle-retaining force or being overly stiff.

Innovation Solution

A cylindrical lock assembly featuring a wrap-around catch spring with a continuously curved segment greater than 180 degrees, a key spindle assembly with retractor activation cams, and a torque plate mechanism, all made from stamped sheet metal to reduce costs and enhance functionality, allowing selection between standard and rigid lock trim configurations without structural modifications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional cantilever-type knob catch assemblies are used, then the structure is simple, but the handle-retaining force is either weaker than desired or the spring is too stiff and easily overstressed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandle-retaining forceVSAvoidspring durability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The spring is segmented into multiple active coils rather than being a single cantilevered element. This segmentation allows the load to be distributed across multiple coils, providing adequate handle-retaining force while preventing any single point from being overstressed, thereby improving both strength and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The spring design parameters are optimized by specifying precise coil dimensions, wire diameter, and active coil count to achieve the desired force characteristics. The spring rate is carefully calculated to provide sufficient retaining force without being overly stiff, resolving the contradiction between strength and durability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If large cast spindle bearings are used to house lever return springs, then the lockset provides desired strength and durability, but the fabrication cost increases due to the casting process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelockset strengthVSAvoidfabrication cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The lever return springs are extracted from the spindle bearing housing and relocated to the lock body. This eliminates the need for large cast spindle bearings, allowing the use of simpler, more cost-effective bearing components while maintaining the required strength and durability through the lock body's structural design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The lock body is designed to serve multiple functions: it houses the retractor mechanism and also provides housing for the lever return springs. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate specialized components like cast spindle bearings, reducing manufacturing complexity and cost while maintaining structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If internal rose cages are used to house lever return springs, then the lockset functions properly, but the trim becomes very large and prominent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelockset functionalityVSAvoidtrim size
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The lever return springs are extracted from the traditional internal rose cage housing and relocated to the lock body. This eliminates the need for large rose cages, allowing the trim to be significantly reduced in size while maintaining all necessary lockset functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The spring housing arrangement is repositioned from the radial dimension (rose cage around the spindle) to the axial dimension (within the lock body structure). This dimensional change allows the trim to be minimized while the spring mechanism remains functional within the lock body's internal volume

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a cost-effective, strong, and versatile lockset with improved handle retention and reduced component complexity, supporting a range of lock functions while minimizing configuration differences and component variations.

Implementation Method 1

Release-actuating force imposed on the knob catch assembly elastically deforms the substantially continuously curved segment of the wrap-around catch spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS8844330B2Cylindrical lockset
Publication Date: 2014.09.30 TOWNSTEEL INC
  • US8844330B2 patent drawing
  • US8844330B2 patent drawing
  • US8844330B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cylindrical lockset comprises a multiple-compartment lock cage subassembly. A retractor is housed within a middle lock cage compartment. Spindle return torsion springs, for biasing corresponding handle-carrying spindles to their default positions, are housed within axially adjacent lock cage compartments. A torque plate transfers torque from the lock cage subassembly to relatively radially distal trim posts. A knob catch assembly seated in each handle-carrying spindle comprises a generally elliptically-shaped wrap around catch spring and a knob catch backup washer to resist axial loads produced by efforts to pull a handle off of the spindle. A key spindle provides a dog travel window defined by a closed, continuous edge of the key spindle, which window is positioned opposite of an axially-extending seam of the key spindle.